Which is worse? Being a 43 yo virgin or being 48 and never having fallen in love with anyone?

Second one.

The first one isn't a big deal.

Well if you are 48 and have never fallen in love with anyone you won't miss the feeling so I believe that's alright.. what you don't miss doesn't make you unhappy... and about the 43 year old virgin.. if that person is a virgin out of choice.. then the same applies for that person.. they don't miss it.. so they aren't unhappy.. people should be allowed to live their lives as they see fit as long as they don't hurt anyone else...

Being a 43 year old virgin, for a guy, is whithout a doubt worse, unless the guy is gay. But if he is gay, and won't admit it to himself or others, that is even more pathetic. He should be honest with himself, above all. But what a hapless existence never to have shared intimate moments with another person.

Being 48 and never in love is probably more common than most people think. Many people never find love in their life, but they accept what they have and make the most of it. They can still have relationships and good times and memories. They just haven't found the right one, and aren't willing to settle for less, as many men do.

Well I am 38 a virgin and never have been in love but if I were to choose, I would have to say that never being in love is worse at 48. Yes I want sex but I don't want to skimp on love either.

yikes.

i dont even know.. that's tough.

I guess the 48 and never fallen in love with someone, because you've never experienced how wonderful that can really be.

I guess you could say the same for the 43 one...

but i think the other one is worse.

Being a 43 yr old virgin/.

Neither! If your happy in your life, then you will never miss the things you never had. Makes sense to me.

I don't see what is wrong with either of them.