For Democrats....I know that Obama is running on the issue of change...?

He was against invading Iraq from the start, has astutely championed withdrawing U.S. combat forces during what is likely to be a temporary lull in violence, and was much more measured about the conflict in Georgia, which threatened no vital U.S. strategic interest.

If the U.S. pulls out, we will get a ‘peace dividend’ — a whole lot of money now being spent on the war will be available for other purposes. No doubt lots of people, in both parties, will have ideas for ways of spending it.

“Suppose Obama commits himself not to let the peace dividend be spent on new projects, or at least not all of it. Suppose, for instance, that he promises that at least half of the saving will be used to reduce the budget deficit. That puts him in the position of the fiscally responsible candidate, which should appeal to conservatives as well as libertarians. And it is a pledge that McCain cannot match, since he supports the war and so is not going to have any peace dividend to allocate. …”

"I will not vote for someone who just trashes the other side and doesn't lay out the facts"- Then I guess you won't be voting for McCain then!

One of the major things that Obama will change- health care and lower taxes for the middle class.

McCain- no change. Follow the same destructive path as Bush.

His economic plan = change

His iraq plan = change

Senator Obama has been able to develop innovative approaches to challenge the status quo and get results. Americans are tired of divisive ideological politics, which is why Senator Obama has reached out to Republicans to find areas of common ground. He has tried to break partisan logjams and take on seemingly intractable problems. During his tenure in Washington and in the Illinois State Senate, Barack Obama has accumulated a record of bipartisan success.

Just check out his blueprint for change...

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForCh...

you in simple terms heard what you wanted pay attention, because of fact Rev. Wrights indignant message centred a corrupt government, no longer White usa. The hateful words you heard became certainly the soreness of seeing what got here approximately on 9/11. It became the soreness of understanding usa have been warned approximately this and did no longer something to end it. it is the soreness--expressed in anger which you heard. Obama would not locate himself in a "quagmire" in any respect. that's YOU who would desire to be certain in case you want to proceed to pretend to no longer comprehend, or while you're waiting to place racism aside and stand at the same time against the bypass of corruption in Washington. And, in reality, if we are to alter Washington, it has to start from the main appropriate down--no longer the backside up. particular, our leaders would desire to be receptive to this alteration. Racism must be dealt with from the main appropriate stages if government, that's why i'd in no way solid my vote for Hillary Clinton. The Hillary camp has used racism as a device, to further Hillary's reason, and that unfavorable mentality is unacceptable interior the White living house. we are able to't be represented by way of somebody who purposely separates the persons, to further her very own egocentric schedule. we want representation by way of persons who will carry us at the same time--people who comprehend that racism weakens the countries. i do no longer understand all the solutions any longer than you do. yet i comprehend that i do no longer want to work out any of my fellow human beings lose their jobs, their properties, or something they have worked for because of greed in Washington. no remember what race they're, i'm prepared to stand with my fellow human beings against the corruption in government. If by way of status at the same time, we are able to construct a miles better usa, i'm prepared to place racism aside the two for myself and my babies. it is the alternative YOU and another American is confronted with.