Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How did the credit crisis happen?
If the democrats are so smart, why didn't they begin to immediately fix the problem when they received control after the 2006 elections? The republicans actually began warning about this in 2003, 2004 and 2005. Both Bush and McCain are on record as providing warnings of this problem. If the problem was visible, or even remote foreseeable, in 2003, then it only makes sense that the problem continued to get worse along the way.
Why didn't the democrats start working on this in 2007 or at least by the first quarter or two of this year?
nothingconstant - Yes, I read all of your post. Your statement that "Loans were given to qualified applicants" is a joke and you have no clue as to what was really going on in the recent past.
I propose that you simply use this information to justify your beliefs. This problem wasn't started at the point the loans were sold to the 2nd or 3rd party.
How do I know what you obviously don't? I personally was involved in selling several properties between 2002 and 2006 were I wouldn't have lended the buyer a dollar unless I was willing to write it off. Of course, as the seller, I couldn't question the qualifications of the seller without cause, even though I KNEW that each and every one of those loans would end up in default. And guess what? They did. So, the problem was the quality of the loan and the ability of the lendors to claim they were acceptable.
So, how does that make your partisan cut-and-paste crap look now.
Neoga illinois - What a lame attempt to discredit my question. Do you even know what a troll is? The facts speak for themselves in regards to who proposed more oversight for Fannie and Freddie, so you are apparently not informed enough to know.
That also covers JLC who apparently has his eyes shielded from anything that would go against the liberals who praised Frannie and Freddie all the way down.
12 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Because Democrats were busy CAUSING the credit crisis by insisting that banks give mortgages to people who had no way of paying them. Democrats call this "compassion". I call it abuse.
- nothingconstantLv 71 decade ago
My answer is going to be long. Will you read it?
The world savings in 2001 was 36 trillion. The world savings now is 70 trillion. This is a figure from the International Monetary Fund.
Where did all this extra wealth come from? Well societies did better. Abu Dhabi and China for example moved up in wealth.
So what happened here was more money chasing the same amount of sound investments. They craved more investments for all this new savings.
What looked attractive was mortgage backed bundled securities. The mortgage industry grew. Loans were given to qualified applicants and these loans were bundled by the 1000s and sold to investors. After all qualified applicants were basically tapped out, lending practices begin to loosen. It eventually went into a NINA loan. No income no asset. Mortgage companies still profitted because they would just turn around and bundle these mortgages to sell to investors.
So why did all these people put money into mortgage securities?
They were rated by bond agencies like Standard and Poore's as AAA which meant as good as money basically. They were perceived to be safe.
This is the mortgage side of it.. the other involved credit default swaps (bond insurance) and derivatives.
Now doesn't your partisan crap look weak now?
Damn dude.. there was nothing partisan in that above explanation whatsoever. I was saying YOURS was partisan crap.
- 5 years ago
It agree that the credit crunch has been used as a method to gain consent to push forward a conservative economic agenda. This is to do with the fact that big bussiness is calling the shots in the world. The rapidity is due to the fact that people are willing to allow these changes and mergers at a quicker pace because of the sense of economic emergency. Of course in a time of stability this is much more of a creeping process. However as with the credit crunch and the buying up of major firms and increasing costs. The increase in security is related to the sense of crises for western civilisation created by 9/11. The state and bussinesses are powerful forces in society and will always siez oppurtunities to press their agenda.
- BenLv 41 decade ago
The credit crisis actually goes back to the Carter administration and the S&L crisis of the '80s. The rough time line goes something like this:
Late '70s/early '80s - the government decides to try and reign in stagflation, a problem that itself was caused by failed government policies. They go from artificially low interest rates to artificially high ones and successfully choke the economy further. Carter gets booted out of office and replaced by Ronald Reagan for his miserable stewardship of the economy.
1980s - S&L crisis. Banks fail. The stock market tumbles in the late '80s.
Late '80s, early '90s - Upon the recovery of the stock market, the government and lending institutions seem to forget how much things sucked when they made stupid decisions. The deregulation of the financial industry begins at the behest of Republicans. Democrats successfully push through legislation that insures loans to minorities for a perceived discriminatory practice among lenders to only lend money to whites. While it's true that there was some discrimination, what the Democrats fail to realize is that the reason that most of these people were being denied credit had more to do with the fact that they were either unemployed or underemployed and had never paid a bill in their life. Banks lent to them anyway, because if they defaulted, they could get their money from the government. Sure bet!
Late '90s, early 2000s - having made a killing lending money to minorities with crappy credit, banks decide that they should start lending money to white people with crappy credit. Thanks to the Republican-backed deregulation of the mortgage industry and a complete lack of oversight on, well, ANYTHING, banks start issuing loans with confusing terms and fluctuating interest rates to people who were just glad to buy a home and didn't really concern themselves with how they'd pay their mortgage when the payment tripled after the teaser rate expired. Oh, and they decided that people with good credit could use their home like an ATM through home equity lines, just so everybody could get in the high debt fun.
Present day - because the loans to minorities with crappy credit were made in smaller numbers, when they defaulted, it wasn't in waves and it didn't cause a crisis. But now, thanks to artificially low interest rates, a glut on the housing market has led to tumbling home prices, which means that many people with crappy credit owed way more on their homes than they were worth. Teaser rates start to expire, and, who would've guessed, the people who were deadbeats all their life couldn't make the higher monthly payments. All of a sudden, lots and lots of people started to default on their mortgages. And in addition to a lot of people with no homes, you find that banks are starting to take a hit too, because the outstanding balance on the loan is significantly more than what the current housing market values the home at. Mortgage companies start to flounder, and the securitized debt from these mortgages becomes almost worthless. All of a sudden, the other financial institutions on Wall Street start to hurt, and it leads to a cascade effect. Everybody with a connection to mortgage industry is hurting or going out of business, which means that lending institutions have to shore up their cash reserves to survive - which means lending less, which means that credit is harder to come by. This further chokes off individuals and businesses that have come to rely on credit instead of good old fashioned savings to run.
The problem was caused by pretty much everybody in America. The Democrats for encouraging lending institutions to make irresponsible loans to individuals with risky credit, the Republicans for deregulating the industry without putting in any kind of oversight, predatory lending institutions for writing bad loans, other Wall Street firms for buying so much mortgage related debt, and Americans who didn't know how to say "no" to more house and debt than they could possibly afford.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You average citizen has to take their fair share of the blame too. Many people got into houses bigger than they could afford, living beyond their means, charging their credit cards up to an amount they couldnt afford. Now many people are in their houses upside down, letting them foreclose and figuring they will just buy again. People are not responsible with their money.
There is no independence so important and no dignity as impressive as living within your means.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
because the democrats didnt want people's feelings to be hurt when they got denied for a house.
they want everything to be fair (communist), as Biden's debate clearly showed the other day.
+ the democrats were making huuugee bank for keeping their mouths shut.
Obama has gotten a ton of funding for his campaign by Fannie Mae.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If you think it's bad now, the Obama Democrat hand outs have only just begun.
Free houses, free cars, free trips to Cuba.
- in vino veritasLv 61 decade ago
Greedy banks - practicing deceptive predatory lending - in order to fatten their swine-ish wallets...
If anyone truly understands what a "derivative" is, they will understand.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Obama/Biden 08, 12.