Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 1 decade ago

Do you think it's pathetic how cons try to claim liberal civil right activist MLK Jr as one of their own?

MLK Jr was a conservative Republican?

Did he stand for the status quo? No.

Was he a Republican? No. He was a member of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party and even attended DEMOCRATIC conventions.

The only thing cons have is some link from a black Republican website with a membership of what, 5 people?

You need to come up with FACTS from reliable sources.

===================

Update:

MLK JR ATTACKING THE PRO-WAR RIGHT (INCLUDING REAGAN)

"The war has strengthened domestic reaction. It has given the extreme right, the anti-labor, anti-*****, and anti-humanistic forces a weapon of spurious patriotism to galvanize its supporters into reaching for power, right up to the White House. It hopes to use national frustration to take control and restore the America of social insecurity and power for the privileged. When a Hollywood performer, lacking distinction even as an actor can become a leading war hawk candidate for the Presidency, only the irrationalities induced by a war psychosis can explain such a melancholy turn of events."

- Martin Luther King Jr, Domestic Impact of War, Nov 1967

http://www.aavw.org/special_features/speeches_spee...

===============

Update 2:

MLK JR ATTACKING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR TURNING TOWARDS THE RIGHT (TRYING TO WIN OVER THE RACIST SOUTH)

"The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism, reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the radical right. The "best man" at this ceremony was a senator whose voting record, philosophy, and program were anathema to all the hard-won achievements of the past decade.

Update 3:

"It was both unfortunate and disastrous that the Republican Party nominated Barry Goldwater as its candidate for President of the United States. In foreign policy Mr. Goldwater advocated a narrow nationalism, a crippling isolationism, and a trigger-happy attitude that could plunge the whole world into the dark abyss of annihilation. On social and economic issues, Mr. Goldwater represented an unrealistic conservatism that was totally out of touch with the realities of the twentieth century. The issue of poverty compelled the attention of all citizens of our country. Senator Goldwater had neither the concern nor the comprehension necessary to grapple with this problem of poverty in the fashion that the historical moment dictated. On the urgent issue of civil rights, Senator Goldwater represented a philosophy that was morally indefensible and socially suicidal."

- MLK Jr, The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr

http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/publications/au...

Update 4:

MLK JR PRAISING DEMOCRAT JFK AND ATTACKING REPUBLICAN NIXON

And yet, when this moment came, it was like he had never heard of me. So this is why I really considered him a moral coward and one who was really unwilling to take a courageous step and take a risk. And I am convinced that he lost the election because of that. Many Negroes were still on the fence, still undecided, and they were leaning toward Nixon. My father had endorsed Nixon until that call. He knew about my relations with Nixon, and I think he felt that Nixon would do a good job on the civil rights question. I guess deep down within there may have been a little of the religious feeling that a Catholic should not be president. I'm sure my father had been somewhat influenced by this, so that he had gone on record endorsing Nixon. After that call, he changed, and he made a very strong statement... I had to conclude that the then known facts about Kennedy were not adequate to make an unqualified judgment in his favor....

Update 5:

I do feel that, as any man, he grew a great deal. After he became president I thought we really saw two Kennedys-a Kennedy the first two years and another Kennedy emerging in 1963. He was getting ready to throw off political considerations and see the real moral issues. Had President Kennedy lived, I would probably have endorsed him in 1964. But, back at that time, I concluded that there was something to be desired in both candidates.

- MLK Jr, The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr

http://stanford.edu/group/King/publications/autobi...

Update 6:

Justin,

He would not be a conservative even today. He said some pretty controversial things including that America was the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. When he was killed, he was on a campaign for increasing the standard of living of poor people through government action.

Update 7:

kroll,

Are you kidding me? Notice how I used the words conservative and liberal? Today's SOUTHERN conservative Republican Party is nothing like the Radical Republican Party of Lincoln. That party was based in states like Massachusetts, not Mississippi.

14 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    "You need to come up with FACTS from reliable sources."

    Good luck getting them to do that.

  • 1 decade ago

    Testy, eh? Well the Republican party was in fact the first civil rights proactive party resulting in the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments.

    The conservative Supreme Court ruled on Brown v. Board of Education which invalidated Plessy v. Ferguson. And it wasn't until the early 60s that the Dems even reached out to get the minority vote. Before then they were more racist than the Reps. And I say that in particular in the South which was solid Dem territory, just not the kind you wanted.

    Lyndon B. Johnson fought civil rights or was indifferent to it until after Kennedy was assassinated. He did that because he felt he could capitalize on the minority vote. And since then the Dems have been closer to minorities than Reps. But prior to that, Dems had a dismal civil rights record.

  • 1 decade ago

    Jackie Robinson too.

    Republican's voted for the first 2 African American US Senators...in the 1800's. It took Democrats a while to catch up.

  • 1 decade ago

    I really don't give a rat's *** what party MLK was in. He stood for change, help made the community progress and help Americans everywhere. He was less a politician and more of a activist. A activist for progress...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Not sure where these people are coming up with this stuff, however, a middle of the road Democrat from the early 60's they would be less far less liberal than John McCain.

  • 1 decade ago

    Obviously if you look at the make-up of both parties by race it is clear that the party that has 76% of its members as white has not changed much.

    MLK would not support the republican party for sure.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's funny how far the Republican party has fallen...

    If MLK was alive today, he would be a Conservative, but NOT a "Republican"

  • 1 decade ago

    I don't think he was a republican.. He had associates in the CPUSA.. RFK had his phone tapped cause he thought the guy was a commie. Why would I think he was a republican if he hung out with communists. Your party does that.. not ours. Take your straw man and roll out.

  • n b
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Architects of change for the common good tend to be Liberal.

  • Bill
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    You can have him! And you also have Robert Byrd who used to associate with the KKK.

  • 1 decade ago

    I would like to think of him as a civil rights activist, not a politician. I don't think that he really belongs to either party, but to the society as a whole.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.