Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

In your opinion, what is the most stupid penalty in the NFL?

What I hate most about the NFL is the rules and terrible officiating. Is there any penalties that you would change in the NFL if it was your league

My changes would be:

-Pass interference would be 15 yd penalty like college

-Roughing the punter wouldn't be an automatic 1st down. (I still dont know why you cant "touch" the punter while punting but if its a bad snap you can destroy him)

-Coaches have one challenge at a penalty or no-call penalty (because of all the ridiculous calls this year ex. Jay Cutlers "incomplete pass" against San Diego)

Update:

Rob B, I understand the rules. Why did you explain about spot ball penalties. I wasnt trying to argue about exaclty how the pass interference rules were in college, but explain my frustration at the NFL rules on it. Also yes, I know about the punter being able to get touched and its only a 5 yard penalty but please tell me when was the last time this was called as I am very curious.

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I agree with you that the stupidest penalty in football is pass interference. Having pass interference be a spot-foul is a pretty major penalty considering that the refs can't begin call it consistently from play to play. Making pass interference a 15 yard penalty (like in college) instead of a spot-foul would at least makes it less of a game-changing call when the refs get it wrong.

    The stupidest rule in the NFL is the rule that limits the number of challenges. I'm all for limiting challenges if the coaches challenge a play and get it wrong, but if the coach correctly challenges a call that was incorrect I think the team should get the challenge back to use again later if they need it.

    When the refs screw up and it's caught on video well enough to reverse the call, the team getting screwed by the bad call shouldn't have to sacrifice a challenge to get the bad call corrected.

    Source(s): In Math class, when Chuck Norris does division there are no remainders.
  • Rob B
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    You really need to understand what you are talking about.

    1) College defensive pass interference is not a 15 yard penalty. Here is a simplified version of the rule:

    - Spot foul up to 15 yards from the line of scrimmage. After that, it's 15 yards. First down in either case.

    - Unless the ball was snapped between the defensive 17 and the 2 and the foul ocurred past the 2 yard line in which case the ball is placed on the 2 yard line with an automatic first down.

    - Unless the play was a try snapped between the 17 and the 2, in which case the penalty is half the distance to the goal line and replay the try.

    2) You can touch the punter without a foul, you can contact him for a 5 yard foul, but the 15 yard variety involves "roughing" which puts the punter in danger of being seriously hurt. By definition it is a Personal Foul and all Personal Fouls include automatic first downs. As for the "bad snap,", if the player does not kick the ball, he cannot be a kicker. It's like sacking the QB is not roughing the passer because he didn't pass.

    3) Coaches challenges have nothing to do with the Jay Cutler "incomplete pass" call this year. It was challenged and the ruling was changed to a fumble. However, it was the rule as written that did not allow the Chargers to get posession. Had it been an issue of him being ruled down before the fumble, then the Chargers would have been given the ball. Now that rule needs to be changed!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well, roughing the punter/kicker is to protect them. After they've let the ball go, they are VERY vulnerable and have no way to protect themselves.

    We don't need coaches challenging penalties either. The refs have a hard enough time as it is. If you don't think so, why don't you go ref some High School football games next year.

    I can't disagree with the PI change. I'll go one better, the NFL should adopt the college overtime rules.

  • 5 years ago

    Gay marriage: I'm a Christian, so homosexuality goes against my own beliefs. But, I will not hold it against anyone who is gay, and I think everyone should be able to get married. So I am fine with it. They should have adoption rights too. Death penalty: I don't have much of an opinion about it either way. I think only if the case involved murder it's okay. Abortion: I'm pro-life. I don't think you should abort the baby any way. It's wrong. Pre-marital sex: Honestly I think it's fine if it's 1) safe, as in using condoms, 2) you are at the age on consent and 3) actually love the person. Physician assisted suicide: No, no, no. A doctor should seek help for the person, not help them die. The election: I was kinda hoping for Hilary Clinton, but Obama seems to be doing a decent job. Can I add 3 more you forgot to mention? Circumcision: Yes, it's fine. I don't see why some mothers would oppose it, other than religious reasons. Medical marijuana: Yeah. If the person needs it more medical reasons, not addiction or just to do drugs, it can help them. Sex ed in school: Yup! Kids need to learn about that stuff. You can teach abstinence or whatever, but teach them about condoms and safe sex too!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I think that a coach has as many challenges as they have times outs remaining, and they are not penalized for the timeout if their challenge is upheld.

    I think some of the dumbest rule(s) are the rules regarding helmet to helmet contact, which are being enforced to the level of absurdity thanks to Goodell. last week a guy inadvertently hit the guy with his own facemask and received a penalty.

    The rule should be that a defender (or offensive player) cannot attack the opponent with the crown of the helmet i.e. spearing, and that's it.

  • 1 decade ago

    Celebrating/Taunting in the end zone after a TD. What's the big deal? I hate that there is a 15 yd Unsportsmanlike for that.

    Also, roughing the kicker. Totally stipid. It would be the fault of the offensive line that did not protect the kicker.

    Source(s): NFL.com, NFL Referee rule book. http://profootball.scout.com/2/556118.html, paragragh 5:Individual players are prohibited from using foreign objects or the football while celebrating. They are also prohibited from engaging in any celebrations while on the ground. A celebration shall be deemed excessive or prolonged if a player continues to celebrate after a warning from an official.
  • Chad C
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    "leaping". Ridiculous. I saw it change a game one time between the Colts and Bucs on MNF about 4 years ago

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The tuck rule...a farce of a rule.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    well, id say unessecary roughness...thats what football's all about! roughness! lol

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.