Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which is faster, direct download or torrent?

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    There are many variables, including the server and site you are downloading from or how many seeds you got on your torrent file, but if you want it straight and simple:

    I'd go torrent. You can configure the speed you use and usually there's a good torrent site there that has everything you want to download. Just make sure you have enough peers. =D

    I recommend uTorrent and Azureus (now Vuze).

    www.mininova.org

    www.isohunt.com

    These are the usual good sites to get your torrents from.

    Hope this helps.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Direct-torrent

  • 1 decade ago

    There is no correct answer, as the download speed in both cases can vary greatly depending on which servers or peers your are downloading from.

    In the general case, however, direct downloads are generally considered faster - but nowadays private torrent trackers are offering comparable (or sometimes even better) speeds.

    Compared to public torrent speeds, it is safe to assume that direct downloads will be faster atleast 80% of the time.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Always, always, always depends.

    For me, sites with low traffic, I can direct download a 500 mb file in about 10 minutes.

    But if I were to torrent that same file and it had no seeders, it might take 2 hours.

    If there are more seeders than leechers, torrents are usually faster. But if there's a ton of leechers, just direct download.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There are too many variables to give one answer that will be correct in all instances. If the source has a speedy connection and is near you (in terms of network topology), then that might give you the fastest download. On the other hand, if the direct download source is further away or does not have a speedy connection (or is swamped by simultaneous download requests), then a torrent might be faster -- assuming there is a sufficient number of sources available with good connections who are not too far away.

    Source(s): Off the top of my head based on years of IT support experience.
  • 1 decade ago

    it all depends in the seeder, or server you are downloading from, in some cases direct is faster, in others torrents are faster, there for i rate them at the same speed of downloading. (there are *more* direct site however that will give you a faster connection than the bit torrents)

  • 1 decade ago

    mostly direct downloads are fasters cause torrents may be faster but they depend on the number of seeds that are attached and if there is a small number of seed while a larger number of leechers than a torrent becomes very slow.

    seeds=providers

    leechers=attached in the queue to download simultaneously that same thing you are trying to download

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It simply depends on the seeders. For torrents, there are multiple hosts, therefore having many seeders.

    For direct downloads, there is one host, therefore the upload speed is usually always the same.

    Source(s): Personal experience.
  • 1 decade ago

    torrent usually because you're downloading from multiple people at once

  • 1 decade ago

    im pretty sure torrent is faster

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.