Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is Obama planing to gut the space program?

If so, what will be the ramifications?

http://www.space.com/news/081202-obama-space-spend...

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Still not gutting. It is a critical review of the Ares I program, which, honestly, should have been axed years ago, when it became clear that the first proposal by ATK will not work and heavy modifications are needed (mostly, because the payload additionally gained mass faster as anything else)

    The only people, for which the Ares I is a constant and required component of the future NASA strategy, are NASA managers - external engineers and many NASA engineers have offered many alternatives in the past, which NASA ignored because they had been "not invented here".

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Obama is NOT planning to gut the space program. My computer wouldn't display your link. Check the archives of Time magazine. There was an article in August or September, maybe October, where Obama's position on NASA and the Mars Mission was discussed. He's in favor of the Mar's Mission, but there are other things higher on his priority list right now, like the economy and security of the nation

    Source(s): Grew up with Time magazine as bathroom reading material, and I renewed my subscription recently
  • eri
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Postponing the Mars thing isn't gutting the program. That would have been a HUGE waste of money that could be much better spent in other areas. Very few astronomers actually wanted to go to Mars - that was all Bush thinking he was the next Kennedy.

  • cosmo
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    There's good reason to delay the "Man to Mars" program of the Bush Administration, and concentrate on cheaper, more useful space projects. I've always imagined that "Man to Mars" was a right-wing dodge to de-fund all really important NASA work and put all the funding into a single giant premature, ill-conceived, and therefore cancelable project, thereby killing off NASA without appearing to do so.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Science is always about reinventing and trying new ideas. If you ask me, relying on the space shuttle for so long has made NASA compacent. A little "change" might be good. We'll see.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    no, but Bushie set him up to be the one to make the US wake up and smell the coffee... No Moon Base, No Mars Mission... ever.

    it was just politics.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.