Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

"Roman climate optimum" what is this?

I have seen a number of references to this here, but a Google search seems to show the term only on denier sites, I couldn't find a history related reference to the term.

One of the highest links in the google search was this,

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2007/...

This also is a transcript of a climate skeptic using the term.

Does anyone have a real history or archeology site that references or details the term.

Update:

CrazyCon: interesting? 1000AD to 1400AD you might want to check a history book on when the Roman empire ended ~400AD perhaps the 5 who gave you thumbs up should do the same. What you seem to be talking about is the Medieval warm period I know about this and it is mentioned in real history books my question is about the "Roman climate optimum"

Update 2:

James E

You don't seem to have read the question

"real history or archeology site"

ff.org - about as right wing as you can get

discardedlies.com - denier blog

linkinghub.elsevier.com - states it found nothing "identifiable in this study"

kolumbus.fi/tilmari/some200.htm - also states the Nile froze in 829 again this seems to only be mentioned in denier sites and has been added to the Nile wiki page (with 2 links that don't seem real)

strangely this University history site doesn't mention this major event

http://www.utdallas.edu/geosciences/remsens/Nile/

The GSA link is the only one I would take with more than a grain of salt and it just mentions the name as part of a paper.

I did the Google search as well and could find no reference to it and about 90% of the references were from well known denier blogs and sites they seem to mention it (a lot) in real history sites it seems to be not worth mentioning like the Nile freezing reference above.

Update 3:

James E You seem to just reposted the same blogs, dead end abstracts which have nothing but the name "Roman climate optimum" and the new one "co2science" doesn't even work. You suggest I didn't read your links I think the comments in my previous reply show I did, you then revert to the standard sad attempts at insults about religious faith etc etc, sorry I won't waste anymore time on denier rubbish.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I've also only heard this term referenced by "skeptics". It's used to try and argue that the current warming is a natural cycle, because there was the Medieval Warm Period about 1,000 years ago, and then this supposed 'Roman Optimum' about 1,000 years before that.

    However, neither was a particularly significant warm period on a global scale (though they may have been in localized areas). For example, the MWP was basically a series of different localized warming events in geographic different locations at different times. The so-called Roman Optimum was probably a warm period in Europe, supposedly lasting until 150 BC.

    http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7x.h...

    It doesn't really show up as much in the global temperature proxy data though.

    http://globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Holocene_Te...

    It's just a weak argument with little supporting data to try and argue a weak alternative theory to man-made global warming.

  • 5 years ago

    Climate changes all the time. The human race has only been able to progress to a technological society and to achieve a very large population as we have been able to take advantage of a fairly long warm time, such as has happened between Ice Ages. Before this when climate changed, it affected water precipitation and so the growth of plants and where wild creatures - food - lived. People had to move if their current home became unable to feed and shelter them, or they died out. Violent weather would also make some places uninhabitable. We may be more successful in surviving as we have science to aid us, but nature has a way of showing us how feeble are our efforts at world control. Currently we face a severe problem with the loss of bees in some parts of the world. I do not know if climate change has any effect on this or not. We can cut down on our use of energy unnecessarily and hope this prevents some of the more extreme changes, but if global warming is what we may call a natural event, then it will happen whatever we do and we shall have to learn to cope with it,

  • 1 decade ago

    I saw and commented on the question you seem to be referring to

    http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ag...

    The climate record clearly shows the MWP it also shows the period through 0 - 400AD the end of the Roman civilization it shows some warming around 100AD but as I said in the original question it was cooler then, even at the peak of this "optimum", than today and even the MWP period is cooler than the average we have today.

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:2000_Year_...

  • 1 decade ago

    The IPCC report had used it in their 2nd summary. It showed a distinct period of warmer climate than today from around 1000AD to 1400 AD. However, once Mann introduced the hockey stick, the IPCC quit using the original temp graph (of course once Mann was discredited, they never reintroduced the original). Also, you can look at evidence such as the Nordic settlements which are being revealed because of the melting glaciers. There is also evidence in South America that their glaciers were smaller during this period. Other evidence would be the wineries in parts of the earth which are now to cold to support the vines. The evidence is rather compelling when you look at all of it. The reason you do not see it on pro AGW sites is it really destroys much of their arguments about the earth being warmer now than ever before in recent history. If it was warmer then and they did experience all the ill effects proclaimed to be about to happen, why would we expect to see these calamities now (polar bear dying, species going extinct, flood, drought, etc).

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Here are some studies retrieved in about 10 minutes on google, yahoo search just does not get the good science sites very well.

    http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7x.h...

    Dr. Michael Pidwirny, Associate Professor

    Unit 2: Biology and Physical Geography

    Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences

    University of British Columbia Okanagan

    3333 University Way

    Kelowna, British Columbia

    CANADA V1V 1V7

    http://anthropology.unc.edu/french/he/hebook.html

    The Historical Ecology of Global Climate Change

    Brief summary of Historical Ecology a Multidimensional Ecological Orientation

    In: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. Chapter 1, Carole Crumley

    Santa Fe: School of American research, 1996

    http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2007AM/finalprogram/abst...

    2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)

    Paper No. 215-7

    Presentation Time: 3:00 PM-3:15 PM

    PALEOCLIMATE VARIATIONS FROM 0 TO 12.3 KA BP INFERRED FROM THREE COEVAL CALCITE AND ARAGONITE SPELEOTHEMS FROM MARENGO CAVE, INDIANA, USA

    ZHANG, Ren, SCHWARCZ, Henry P., FORD, Derek C., and BEDDOWS, Patricia A., School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada, zhangr7@mcmaster.ca

    http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S01695...

    Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    A debris flow calendar derived from sediments of lake Lago di Braies (N. Italy)

    References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

    R. Irmler, a, , G. Dauta and R. Mäusbachera

    aFriedrich–Schiller-University Jena, Physical Geography, Institute of Geography, Löbdergraben 32, D-07743 Jena, Germany

    http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/2005...

    The Roman Warm Period and Dark Ages Cold Period in China

    http://www.co2science.org/scripts/Template/MainPag...

    Reference

    Yu, K.-F., Zhao, J.-X, Wei, G.-J., Cheng, X.-R., Chen, T.-G., Felis, T., Wang, P.-X. and Liu, T-.S. 2005. δ18O, Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca records of Porites lutea corals from Leizhou Peninsula, northern South China Sea, and their applicability as paleoclimatic indicators. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 218: 57-73.

    http://www.kolumbus.fi/tilmari/some200.htm

    Timo Niroma:

    Sunspots: The 200-year sunspot cycle is also a weather cycle.

    A 2000-year historical perspective.

    http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/2005...

    The Medieval and Roman Warm Periods in Scandinavia

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reference

    Hormes, A., Karlen, W. and Possnert, G. 2004. Radiocarbon dating of palaeosol components in moraines in Lapland, northern Sweden. Quaternary Science Reviews 23: 2031-2043.

    http://www.icms.com.au/inqua2007/abstract/691.htm

    Environmental change in the Danish Baltic during the Roman Warm Period inferred from mollusc data

    Kaj Petersen, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark

    Peter Rasmussen, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark, Denmark

    David Ryves, Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK, United Kingdom

    Source(s): Obviously if you had bothered to look at the links they are very legitimate scientific papers either already validated by full scientific method or in the process of being vetted unlike the AGW concept papers that are only peer reviewed. But of course no one expects truth from an AGW supporter any longer. For those who accept lies based on religious faith there will be no acceptance of scientific proof. You faith in hucksters keeps you from accepting reality, the next thing you know you will distributing the green news weekend mornings on street corners competing for suckers with the Watchtower crowd.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There was no such thing as a "Roman climate optimum." Non sequitur, Norman coordinate. There was no such thing as a "MWP." Non sequitur, Norman coordinate. There was no such thing as the "PETM." Non sequitur, Norman coordinate. There was no such thing as the "Holocene Maximum." The only thing that is real is the IPCC.

  • BB
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Crazy conservative's submission is right on spot.

    Dana's submission is a Warmer's typical feeble attempt to discredit information that undermines the religious dogma of AGW.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.