Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Anyone else think a 70 year old woman giving birth after IVF id wrong?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20081208/thl-indian-wo...
I just read this on yahoo news and im disgusted. I mean do people like this actually think of the children in these cases? Would a 83 year old woman be able to handle teenage years? Also there is a high chance the parents will die before the child is in adult hood. This is just my view and I'm interested to see what others think.
20 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
It is awful and not natural at all. Those children will not have a normal life because will feel like they have to look after the parents during the free time that they should be spending in the park with other children. Very selfish.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I have never tried for a baby so I have no idea if I am furtile or not, I hope that when the time is right I am able to conceive. I can't imagine the pain of wanting a child and not being able to have one so I can see that better late than never may seem like a good thing to women desperate to have babies. Logistically, however, I agree with you, child bearing and bringing up babies is a massive strain on the any mother but one in her 70's, I don't see how she could cope. I also agree with the fact that there is a high chance of the parents dying before the child reaches adulthood, of course any one of us could die any day but there is no denying it, a woman in her 70's is more probable to die that a woman in her 20's, 30's, 40's or even 50's. It is just a fact of life.
Medical advances are being made everyday but they are not always best for individuals or society.
- AlthaeaLv 41 decade ago
I can understand how horrible it must be to not be able to conceive. But it does seem rather selfish, to put one's own wants and desires before the well being and needs of the child one is bringing into this world. The chances of these parents dying before the child is an adult are much greater than they would be if they were younger. And even if they do live that long, they will most likely be retired and dependant on their child for support. It seems rather unfair to a child who's just turned 18 to have to look after parents in their 80s.
This couple must have been absolutely desperate to have a child, as the guy also married his wife's sister in the hopes that she would have a baby (and didn't). I really hope they've made provision for their child in case they should die, but even if they have, how is money going to be a compensation for loosing your parents so young?
- 5 years ago
I think it is unusual. But if she can afford it, has plans for the child's future financially etc, then why not. I would never do it myself though. I think being pregnant is hard enough at 35, I would not want to be 70 and pregnant. When I was working at a day care center years ago, we had a 3 year old child that was being cared for by her great-grandmother. The woman had to be at least 70 if not much older. Sadly this woman was the only option for care that the child had. Her mother had allowed the little girl to be sexually abused and the grandparents were all drunks. This woman was a good parental figure for the child even though she was in her 70's.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
There is a reason that women go through the menopause - it is our body saying that we are no longer able to carry a child through pregnancy safely.
I have no problem with IVF for those who are of child bearing age but I definitely think there should be regulations specifying a definite upper age limit.
I think that we have to look at this from both sides - like you said - I would doubt that an 83 year old could cope - but i would also say that the child would definitely be subjected to more bullying, and also would be left without parents at a relatively early age (how traumatic would this be? - very)
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I think the menopause is there for a reason, nature designed women to stop producing offspring at the menopause due to the fact that cell division in older people does not operate as well (I know eggs are donated) and the body also struggles to carry a pregnancy to term, and finds birth much harder. Lets be honest in biological terms ( not society's terms) the average women has nearly 40 years to conceive a child before the menopause happens what's stopping them.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It is wrong and selfish. That is why the body goes through changes when it is time to stop having children. Plus what is going to happen to the child when the parent kicks the bucket.
There should be a law stopping this kind of thing from occuring.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I think it's extremely selfish of her. If she lives until the child starts school, other pupils will ask whether it's the child's great-grandmother at the gate. If he says that it's his mother, he will be mocked or bullied. When the child becomes a teenager and needs his mother she may be dead or infirm. She will become a burden to her child while he is still young.
- 1 decade ago
What happens to the child when the parents pop their clogs which will happen when the child is younger than the chances of them growing.
Terrible!