Why are humans so flawed and lesser animals so perfect ?

Good Question. Animals have completed their development. But human beings have only been taken up as far as nature wants them to go. If a solitary human being wants to complete his or her development or evolution (and I mean the evolution of their consciousness...there is no other kind of evolution), they must do the work themselves. There are three traditional ways for this to occur. The way of the Fakir, who works on his physical body; the way of the monk, who works on his emotions; and the way of the yogi, who works on his intellect. All of these ways can lead a person to a higher state of consciousness. They are long and difficult, with scattered results.

But there is a fourth way that the first three ways do not know about, in which a person works on all three parts at the same time. In addition, the fourth way takes place in the conditions of ordinary life. One does not have to be secluded in some monastery or abbey somewhere. The work takes place in the life most familiar to them.

When a fox is just slightly faster than a rabbit, I doubt the rabbit sits and analyzes how perfection put him on the dinner plate.

1. Human perception is not the determinate of perfection

2. Animal frailty (meaning IN HUMANS) is not a defect, just a fact

3. Why are any animals LESS THAN HUMANS?

I think this question is based on horrendously mistaken assumptions.

Human beings are held to a higher standard than animals in our own minds, and so we see our flaws more clearly than theirs. Lesser animals are so much more simple, their innocence them seem flawless.

All living things except human being dun farted around with MOTHER NATURE ORDERs and HUMAN does!

What gave you that idea. I'm perfect.