Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 1 decade ago

Why is it that ancient language (Sanskrit) is used for mantras rather than modern languages we use today?

Will they have the same effect if we translate them into the simple language we use today?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Language is only a tool. The language practiced

    by a group of people living in a marked geographica location would vary from place to place in speaking style and accent. For example our Tamil people of different district use slang

    differently.Themetalanguageuage and grammar same. spoken language is different.

    Most people use a language which is not usually

    their mottonguengue for religious people.For example Muslims of India recite only AraGoranoran for prayer though they have Tamil/Hindi translations.

    Similarly people in India attach much importance to Sanskrit as a religious language. Though they may not understand the meaning of it, they insist on the Sanskrit hymn to be recited for prayer for its hallowed holy sound effect. They believe sound vibration iself will get them well.

    Yes. You can use your own mother toungue for prayer. God knows your heart even with out a single word uttered by you.

  • 1 decade ago

    The mantras were spoken and written in Sanskrit, which is far from being an outmoded language. Sanskrit is one of the 22 official languages of India. It is, however, primarily used for religious purposes and for scientific discourse. Those who use it understand what they are saying.

  • 1 decade ago

    My dear language does not matter at all . Mantras are for mental well being and its for ourselves.It Totally depends on you , i mean language really does nt matters... Be it english, Hindi, Urdu or sanskrit... doesnt effect ur intension...

  • 1 decade ago

    You should see the new MENTOS advertaisment it will show how the human converted to this level.......we peoples not born yesterday or day befor.....Long bak...our dressing was diffrent language was diffrent...foods was diffrent....slowly its converted....it will never stop...after few years....we will use some other language.....like that ...the veda and manthras used sanskrit ...thats was the communication language that time..

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Sanskrit is a tough language for us......and moreover this is not a compulsary language in Indian study pattern.....

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    in case you incorporate the proto-languages, which later grew to advance into Sanskrit and Tamil, they the two have relating to the comparable age, from 2000 to 1500 BCE, in accordance to linguistic data. each and each of something is idle hypothesis or unconfirmed theories. "with the intention to describe the hassle-free effective factors shared with the aid of Sanskrit and different Indo-ecu languages, many scholars have proposed migration hypotheses asserting that the unique audio gadget of what grew to advance into Sanskrit arrived in what's now India and Pakistan from the north-west some time for the duration of the early 2nd millennium BCE. data for this style of thought consists of the close relationship of the Indo-Iranian tongues with the Baltic and Slavic languages, vocabulary exchange with the non-Indo-ecu Uralic languages, and the character of the attested Indo-ecu words for organic worldwide." "The earliest attested Sanskrit texts are Hindu texts of the Rigveda, which date to the mid-to-previous due 2nd millennium BCE. No written archives from such an early era proceed to exist. besides the incontrovertible fact that, scholars are effective that the oral transmission of the texts is solid: they have been ceremonial literature whose splendid pronunciation replaced into seen had to its non secular efficacy." "A written checklist might encode a level of a language resembling an before time — the two hence of oral custom, or because of the fact the earliest source is a duplicate of an older manuscript that replaced into lost. Oral custom of epic poetry might frequently bridge some centuries, and in uncommon cases, over a millennium. An extreme case is the Vedic Sanskrit of the Rigveda: the earliest areas of this text are dated to ca. 1500 BC, whilst the oldest hassle-free manuscript dates to the eleventh century advert, resembling a gap of roughly 2,500 years." "The linguistic data skill that Proto-South Dravidian replaced into spoken around the middle of the 2nd millennium BC, and that proto-Tamil emerged around the third century BC. The earliest epigraphic attestations of Tamil are many times taken to have been written presently thereafter." "scholars categorise the attested history of the language into 3 classes, old Tamil (3 hundred BCE – seven-hundred CE), middle Tamil (seven-hundred–1600) and modern-day Tamil (1600–modern-day)."

  • 1 decade ago

    if u know the exact meaning then pronounce t n any language ,doesn;t matter,do not manipulate

  • 1 decade ago

    it is Professional that's the reason.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    aunty i love you!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.