Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should we tag the released detainees?

As the detainees have been going through rehabilitation and are still returning to their Al Qaeda groups, wouldn't it be a good idea of equipping them with a chip similar to those used on our pets so we can find them again?

I am not saying that they are less human or trying to be insulting, but this would be a way to keep tabs on them and follow their movements leading us to other terrorist organizations.

I believe that in the near future we will all be tagged in a similar way.

Update:

It seems that I have really got some action on this question. And thank you all very much.

More later

Update 2:

While I agree they should be shot, we can use them to find more of their ilk to try to rid the world of them.

Update 3:

The chips could be impregnated with a slow acting poison or some other destructive device that attempted removal would kill them and the people doing the removal.

When it comes to hurting or killing innocent people I become very angry and vile.

Update 4:

One possible problem with this would be that it would be used as a test to implant all Americans if we were to become a global or North American state. Imagine the consequences in that.

Update 5:

Great idea, but be sure and warn them to watch their step because the first one is a doosie!

Update 6:

So far my experiment in psychology has been great. Most people have no qualms about surveillance chips in the human being any more than they would their dog or cat.

Now, if you will answer this: How would you feel about mandatory chipping of the population of the U.S.?

Update 7:

I agree that the tagging of the general citizenry sounds wrong, but at the same time it could be good. Consider, if government was not evil and corrupt, it would be good in order to find the lost but with the government being evil they will use it as a control factor, which negates the good it can do.

29 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Tag? I like the bullet to the mid brain better than the GPS idea, though it is interesting as a concept. The prob, as stated already, is that we don't want to give them any ideas. I have rather liked the idea of feed them something deadly and let them carry it back to the nest, gets the whole bunch of cockroaches with a minimum of muss and fuss. I have occasionally wondered if GW didn't send out a few good black ops men with just that notion in hand, hunt them down and kill them where they hide. 'Course if he did, we'll never know. oh, that's the Orkin motto!

    Orkin for Secretary of Defense.

    I have always thought, and understood, that civil rights were for Civilians, which is to say people who are not members of their Country's military system. Their Country. Last I looked, none of the crap at Gtmo Bay are citizens of the US. Therefore, they HAVE no civil rights (take that ACLU!) and I'd give them half a flight home. Half a flight home, let them off at 35,000 feet and good riddance to bad rubbish. Plus, if I might be so bold, no muss, no fuss, no pesky bodies to dispose of.

  • 1 decade ago

    I agree with you that something needs to be done once the terrorists are set free in order to keep track of their movements, but I'm very skeptical of chip implantation on humans. That would be the first step in our government watching our every move and the end of civilization as we know it.

    Those men were put in Gitmo for a reason, detained there for a reason. I truely believe and this comes from working in the legal field for years and knowing how flawed our justice system is, our government knew these men were terrorists and they also knew there was a bigggg possiblily that they would be set free to go out and terrorize again. The ACLU would have jumped on that case in a heartbeat in representing them. The more I've worked for the courts the more I witnessed criminals having more rights than victims, but this is just my theory on why they were detained so long. No proof to back it up except for what I've witnessed.

    Your heart is in the right place though and makes a good topic of discussion.

    Maybe in all fairness, we should give them a running start and sick pitbulls after them....lol

    Edit: That is something everyone needs to really consider. Sure, it sounds good to use it on criminals, but that would be the first step. If governments see that people are all for that, then they'll come up with a scheme to implant them in everyone and everyone would fall for their deception. Such as...Implanting them in babies so that they could be found in case of kidnapping. What people don't understand is, although those things sound good to citizens, but to the government, it's their way of having total control over a human being. We'll become puppets to their every wish and command. I know they've already implanted those in some with the excuse of experimentation and research. That scares the heebeegeebees out of me.

  • 1 decade ago

    The micro-chipping has been done to all the inhabitants of Ghana

    So now we can say it can be done, there is a chemical in the microchip that is poisonous, and it can be detonated and the person can be killed. Also if they try to remove it it detonates on it's own, killing the person in a matter of 5 minutes. A few women in Ghana tried to remove their own microchip and it killed them. They were the test subjects in this. And yes Obama plans on micro-chipping the USA people, starting with the newborns in USA. As for the criminals being microchips from Guanto.Bay.... it's great, do it, and then also keep the sensor on so we can find them, then once they were there with their bad kind kill them and send our missiles and kill the lot of them right then are there. I have no sympathy for anyone in that prison. And frankly, though I am against Obama putting it in our own citizens to find us, or watch our whereabouts, and eventually kill the undesirables who think against his New World Order. I do believe the criminals that are bad, should be micro-chipped then the ones on death row should be and detonated and killed off. Probably better to kill off the death row, cause it would save us money to feed them.

    If you knew your babies if born in 2009 and 2010 and later would be micro-chipped would you continue to have and make babies, or would you home-birth quietly and not make a birth certificate for them.??? Well think about that, cause it's coming in 2009 and 2010.

    If you still read my past responses to questions in Sept, October and November 2008, you will see that I am not for this new regime. The change people is the New World Order, it's here and it will be implemented.

  • 1 decade ago

    I shan't make the obvious and unworthy jest about bucks and does, but the thought did obtrude, I have to say. It is a thought, though, if one didn't mind fostering barbarian impulses in one's countrymen. But, hey, that would just give us something in common with those poor, abused detainees. Wouldn't it?

    But I have to say that I agree with the many who feel that the best solution would be a nice, frugal high calibre slug in the back of the head. No need for fuss and muss, no pomp or circumstance, just a quick and fatal register of your distaste of their sharing your air. Call it a concrete expression of your doubts regarding the wisdom of settling these vermin in the country they yearn to destroy. And I think whoever carries out the sentence, ought to be granted the license to gack any complainant ACLU lawyers, too. Two birds with one stone, as it were.

    They do all they can to obscure the fact, of course, but the actuality is that only citizens--that's what the term means, after all--have civil rights in this country, which none of those scum are. So, as far as I can see, they have no rights we don't give them. And a quick death is certainly more than you, or your wife or children, could expect to receive from them.

    Come on, people, nothing we do is going to convince them that we're good guys, because according to their religion, we aren't. Plus that it's politically expedient, and they're all about making that mileage.

    Just make it a quick bullet.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I agree that in the near future they will try to tag all of us, and therefore my answer to your question is NO. I will not contribute to that infrastructure in anyway, shape, or form. Doing so will only speed up the process of microchipping the rest of the population.

    We don't need to worry about terrorism the way the media claims we do. It is inevitable, unstoppable, and is generally a staged attack (anyone with experience and a conventional weapon can cause terrorism on a mass scale...ask Malvo). Anyone who believes we have been safe since 9/11 due to an increase in security is a fool and has fallen victim to the propaganda matrix the Global-Elite has been running for many decades now (even more so in the last 10 years). If the Al-Qeada fairy tale were actually true, we would have seen MANY smaller attacks (that's their nature) since 9/11 and continuing on today....much like you see in Gaza. If they were the ruthless martyrs our govt says they are, they wouldn't have remained this silent for this long....ESPECIALLY since their recruiting numbers have skyrocketed with our occupation(s) of their holy land.

    See the interview with Aaron Russo to hear what the plans of the Rockefeller's and the Global-Elite are...

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830...

    ...It's a fantastic wake-up call for the uninformed.

  • This is a great idea!!!...seems the Obama administration will find ways of releasing these cockroaches...why NOT tag them and follow them...only problem I see is the same Obama admin would forbid our covert operations services from ever doing something so...inhuman...they would never allow them to follow up and do something when the released prisoners DO lead them to the den of the cockroaches....one thing you have to know about libs...they ALWAYS protect the life of the convicted, while DEMANDING the ability to murder the most innocent and defenseless of us all....the unborn fetus....THIS is why libs in power are so dangerous..they are warped, and void of reality...

    Ok, you said to chip the terrorists whom I have no sympathy for whatsoever...now you are talking about mandatory chipping of American citizens...this is apples and oranges...we all know the technology exists right now to do this...so implanting people is nothing new....its WHO you implant...terrorists who have a tendency to kill innocent people??...or average Joe the plumber citizen...sorry, in my mind there is no comparison..and I would fight the chipping of the Average citizen with every once of fight I have in me...

  • 1 decade ago

    That's a good idea ...but unfortunately President would say that was torture. You may not want to say they are less human...so I will say it for you..they are less human if they were not they would act human.

    Terrorist are cold blooded killers.....remember the ones that they shot in the head point blank when the war first started....I did not know any of those people but I cried my eyes out for the families that watched their children,fathers,son's and daughters being killed in that fashion.Remember 9/11 when families watched and cried for those that lost family members that day. I suppose a few of you have forgotten or just don't care anymore.

    I can forgive their souls' but I can not have mercy on them.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Tagging would be one way to keep a recognition profile on them. The tag

    would have to be so sophisticated that the bad guy would never know he

    had it, And the RF on the tag would have to be impervious to wand or

    scanners. We have those by the way, and could be done. I'm sure its

    been thought of, But as to why its not been implemented I'm not sure,

  • 1 decade ago

    You know, tagging them with irremovable chips and then tracking them in order to find and destroy Al Qaeda cells doesn't sound like a half bad idea. I think you might have hit upon something.

  • L.T.M.
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Hey, we could do them like chickens on the farm..one whack with a cleaver and see how far they will run with no head! They could be easily identified that way too. They'd be the terrorists with no heads lol. Or we could implant a 50cal slug in the brain. I could go on all night with this one. I for one have not forgotten 9 -11!

    http://www.history.com/genericContent.do?id=60326

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.