Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 1 decade ago

If evolution is true where is man ape?

Where do I go to find man ape? I would like to go to him and worship him? Then I can give up on Christ.

Update:

No where is this half man half ape creature or some would call him the missing link. Where is he so I can go speak with him.

27 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Look in mirror

  • 1 decade ago

    Humans are classed in the family Hominoidae, the great ape family, so technically speaking, according to Linnaean classification, we are apes. Our most recent common ancestor with all other apes is probably Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, which lived 11-14 million years ago (known from fossil evidence). From recent studies of molecular genetics, it appears as though reproductive isolation between humans and chimpanzees (our closest ape relative) began about 10 million years ago, although some gene interchange (interbreeding) occured until complete reproductive isolation was achieved about 5 million years ago.

    Source(s): The sciences of paleontology, systematics, cladistics and molecular genetics.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well you can find maybe one or two man ape skeletons but the skeleton structure will be thought as ethier an ape or a caveman and not many can actually be discovered because people were smart enough back then not to run into tar but neanderthals do fit that description

  • Paul B
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    I wouldn't worship him unless you believed in an extreme form of ancestor worship. However, if you really do want to go find "man ape", there is a rather fine replica on display at Museo Nacional de Antropología, in Mexico City.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    This topic intrigues me.. So i am going to throw my options on the topic in. you've were given an exceedingly solid question, and that i'm inspired. i actually am an atheist, besides the indisputable fact that I do take exhilaration in logical questions which includes yours. provides me some thing to imagine about. at the same time as i am going to't locate an answer on your question, i am going to furnish this: they have discovered snakes with the skeletal continues to be of legs. What makes it so particular, although, is that it would want to both artwork for AND adverse to proving evolution. in accordance to a christian buddy of mine, the snake from the backyard of Eden lost its legs at the same time as it tempted Eve with the forbidden fruit, as punishment. possibly the fossils hint that that is actual? on the different hand, it would lean more desirable in the direction of evolution. possibly some type of historic 'snake' lost its legs in the course of the evolution procedure? there is also that catfish which will be discovered out of water.. i actually DO ask your self about the.. legitimacy of evolution in certain circumstances. such diverse hoaxes were created.. such diverse fossils were misidentified. on the different hand.. at the same time as the international flooded and Noah made his Ark.. How did Noah assemble 2 of each and every animal? it would take extremely awhile to get that many creatures.. and some lived so a ways away, i don't think of that is obtainable that he accrued all of them so rapidly. It purely would not look logical. My element is that interior the starting up it seems unreasonable that each and each and every animal that exists now will be discovered. i imagine that new creatures HAVE known, or developed because then. I do accept as true with what Shadow said, although. no matter if some type of "data" replaced into given, creationists would argue it. that is not any longer inevitably a foul ingredient although, because that is solid to trust.. and that i assume that maximum evolutionists would proceed to argue their area regardless of any data adverse to THEM. extremely, we are no longer THAT distinct. each and each and every area purely decide on to teach some thing that could in all likelihood never be answered one hundred%.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I hate to be the one to break it to you but in taxonomy humans are classified as apes. The family known as homonidae includes chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and humans. All of these are apes.

    Unless you're arguing that we're not omnivorous, tail-less primates. In which case, what do you base that on?

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Humans are apes. So I suppose the man-ape would be Homo Sapien.

    Chimpanzees are about as close as you will find otherwise maybe Orangutans too.

  • 1 decade ago

    Well come on atheists we know when were not wanted lets just pack up our things and go back to worshiping man ape.

  • 1 decade ago

    The other way round,you might ask to meet the last ape who evolved as man.Well,that's going to be a long search.

  • Danny
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Evolution is true, you dumbhead. And you are looking for man ape? Look around you, evolutionists are everywhere!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    we didnt come from apes fool

    yet it has been proven that we did have a common ancestor

    to my little monkey brothers

    maybe you should study the great ape family some more

    they really are incredibley intelligent creatures

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.