A theses statement for middle east report?? Please!?

-_- You will need a first paragraph first, what is your essay about? Dont say "about Syria" - give more details, on the geo? on the life there? etc..

properly, this may be a hard one.. WWII had long gone on for some years, many human beings had died, and it sounded like Japan could in no way renounce... I belive that the political leaders on the time felt that they had few different techniques to end the conflict.. i've got faith they did no longer leap to the alternative to bomb Japan gently.. and that they might not have bombed a 2nd time if Japan had surrendered after the 1st... i've got faith that the U.S. political leaders have been doing what they theory they had to.. for quite noble reasons whether it became into an aweful ingredient to (could desire to) do. I do say, nonetheless.. that we've little "suited" to be "bitter" offended/or disenchanted approximately Pearl Harbor.. we surely gave them worse than they gave us.. (no longer that it quite is something to be pleased with) I evaluate it to being in a crowded airport and seeing a terrorist newborn (like, say 10 years previous) eliminate his coat to bare a bomb strapped to his chest on a similar time as shouting "dying to individuals" on a similar time as the detonation divice is in his hand.. you be attentive to he's been brainwashed.. you be attentive to he's in basic terms a newborn.. yet you apart from mght be attentive to that he won't pay attention to reason.. do you shoot him before he blows himself and genuinely anyone else up?.... Yeah, surely.. is it the splendid ingredient to do? i think of so.. does it nevertheless suck which you had to shoot a newborn.. surely.. is it something you may desire to quite brag approximately?? No.. I see the bombing of HIroshima/nagasaki on quite the comparable point.. it sucked.. besides the fact that it had to be finished (as a tactics because of the fact the political leaders of the U.S. have been waiting to choose)..