Which zombie apocalypse would you rather fight in?

You're saying I'm standing on top of a rooftop surrounded by zombies that can't possibly reach me, and I'm waiting for a rescue that I'm assured will come? Oh my god, that would be so much fun.

I'd have to say #3, like in Left 4 Dead. Because facing unkillable zombies is no fun. I mean, sure, if you have one chained up in your back yard, it'd be fun to throw stuff at and never have it die... but if you're at a point with a machine-gun in hand and thousands of brainless zombies to kill, what would you want?

Would you want ones that take an unloading of a whole clip? or would you want one that can't take much more than a few bullets? honestly, mowing down zombies would be a lot more fun if you can take down a lot at once.

#2 would be fun if you had 5 zombies in a fence box and they couldn't do anything about it... then you could spend your time shooting them and messing with their heads.

*edit*

buffywaldie, it's all in good fun.

Chuck Norris - he's mortal. Werewolf could be common - from mythology i could in simple terms want silver. Vampire could be common - from mythology i could in simple terms want holy water, silver and garlic (plus some onions and a picnic basket). yet the two jointly (vampire and werewolf) would not be too undesirable, they are going to easily kill one yet another. Chuck Norris could be common - he's human, human beings are common to triumph over and kill, all i could want is a gun. So i could say Chuck Norris.

It sounds as though number three would be the easiest to take out with my twelve gauge, so I'm going to go with it. I might even enjoy it a little. =D

number 2 would be the funnest for me haha lol

What a dumb question...thanks for the 2 points