Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Who is the better bowler Murali or Warne?
When answering this forget about stats
23 Answers
- the ў facюrLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Murali- simply cos warne would usually get to bowl at middle order and tail enders.
Murali would be mostly required to bowl at the opening batsman due to the lack of penetration of the sri lankan quickies...
- Anonymous1 decade ago
On paper Murali has a better strike rate and average but Warne gains ground in almost every other consideration.
Career achievements, Warne played for one of the greatest teams ever.
Quality of opposition: Australia played often against top teams England, South Africa, India etc while Sri Lanka have more games against decent teams like Pakistan and poor teams like Bangladesh.
Pitches: most of Warnes games were on Aussie pitches which are mostly batsmen friendly flat tracks or pitches that favour fast bowlers yet he still had a great record.
Also when looking at the ability of each player to perform in clutch situations Warne won games single handedly (06 Ashes Adelaide) several times in his career and would take wickets in the last ball of days and sessions very often while Murali tends to perform similarly in every situation.
Warne was also a great captain, even though he never had the role he always had a say in field placings
I think on this basis Warne has to be rated the more influential of the two players although people cant be criticised for favouring Murali because its so close
- 1 decade ago
Warne
1.Bowling Leg spin is more tough than off spin
2.Murali's most of the wicket in Spin favourable Sub Continents wicket.Warne being fro a country which doesn't suits spin is better
3.Murali had only Vaas to compete in wicket taking. But Warne had McGrath,Lee,Fleming and Gillespie to compete.
But I like both vey much. Murali in particular.Smiling Assassin. He will be the first bolwer to reach 1000 Wkts in Single format of the game. Kudos Murali. As a bowler Warne is the best. As a Cricketer, Murali is Decent and best cricketer
- ?Lv 44 years ago
Warne became into way better and continuously would be. Murali continuously gets thousands of inexpensive wickets coz srilanka tend to play the no longer so stable components extra many times than the stable ones. Murali doesnt have a great checklist against the particularly some better components like Australia and South Africa. Warne performed stable against absoultely all human beings no longer basically components like Bangladesh and Pakistan and so on.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Shane Warne has it all in his favor.
But where is he except in the IPL. Murali is a sincere player. May not be as flamboyant; But has all the stats with him.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Warne. Murali could rarely do anything against Australia or other decent sides, and sorry but i will refer to stats, his 'legendary' wicket taking hauls have been against teams that Australia dont even bother playing against. Warne doesnt chuck it either. Warney all the way (He wouldve been Aussie captain if it werent for him being a dckhead off the field)