Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you know the difference between causation and correlation?

It's a fact that there is a direct correlation between the number of elephants in a city zoo and the number of crimes committed in that city.

It's a fact that there is a correlation between ice cream sales and instances of rape.

Now some of you have such a problem determining the difference between correlation and causation.

Are elephants the cause of crime? Is ice cream the cause of rape?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Statistics point out correlations but not causes. One or the other of the correlatives might be a cause of the other. Or, more likely, they are both caused by some third factor like population increase or change of weather. Modern day people have been pumped full of correlations, and are thus deluded. For example, the connection between lung cancer and smoking is strong, but correlative rather than causational.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Have you studied the topic on correlation and linear regression yet? Anyway, correlation simply means finding just ANY relation between x and y, for instance. That means, you get an equation mindlessly from all x and y values and figure out a connecting equation. In terms of linear correlation (that means only direct y=ax graphs, not bothering about exponentials, lns, cosine etc), it only IMPLIES causation when the product moment coefficient is high, meaning that your equation line fits your set of values very closely. Do take note that this only IMPLIES causation, but it doesn't necessarily mean there is a cause. This is because philosophically speaking, just because 2 unknowns when plotted on a graph, even when they fit very PERFECTLY, it doesn't mean that there is any causation. I could be due to coincidence, if you really want to go deeply into a philosophical context.

  • 1 decade ago

    The word "correlation" just indicates that there's some kind of connection between two facts, but it doesn't mean that one is the cause of the other. Sometimes, it's the cause, sometimes the consequence, or sometimes the two facts just happen to always be present at the same time in many situations, but nobody knows which one is causing the other or if there really is a relation between both facts.

    Source(s): Just me!
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Correlation is not causation. There may be a correlation between ice cream/rape however that does not necessarily mean that is the cause. There are many other variables

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's the Elephants. They exude a powerful pheromone that causes men to rape women. We should kill all the elephants. With ice cream. No more crime! Kthnxbai...

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.