Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which is more brutal? Waterboarding or Beheading?!?

How naive can those Democrats get?!

Update:

Why do those Human Activists never protest against those terrorists who suicide bombing or beheading the innocents?!

Update 2:

If by using waterboarding to save even one innocent, I am ALL FOR it.

28 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    They are both War Crimes

  • justa
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    You can only die once.

    You can live in fear and pain for years.

    You can die several times a night with waterboarding, and be brought back with a defibrillator, to wonder if they will bring you back next time or let you die, as you choke on the water they pour down your throat.

    Again and again.

    Torture is always more brutal than death.

    One wishes for death so the pain will end, to be brought to the edge time and again is brutality.

    It never does help save a single innocent life. The information we got was never useful. The plans change, the locations change, and the people are not using their correct names so no torture could get what isn't known.

  • 1 decade ago

    So you wouldn't mind being waterboarded as long as we keep the sharp implements out of the room?

    What's worse (you pick what you'd like done to your family):

    child molestation - gang rape

    peeling off skin - burning off skin

    poking out ear drums - poking out eyeballs

    electrocution - drowning

    Before you make the "saving innocent lives" argument, you might want to read what the experts say. You get more information without torture. Bush didn't get 1 piece of useful information from his torture policies. In fact, after torturing people, he let them go so they could tell everyone what was done to them & create more terrorists.

    My favorite stupid conservative argument:

    Obama will release all the evil guys @ Gitmo & they'll come back to kill us.

    Bush let over 500 of them go after beating & torturing them for years. Obama hasn't let one go, he just wants to find out why they're there.

    When torture and murder is considered good, and following the laws is un-American, I have to believe the cockroaches deserve their turn.

    Source(s): I served, chickenhawks didn't.
  • 1 decade ago

    Let me think...

    Waterboarding makes it difficult to breath for a few seconds and you THINK you might drown.

    Beheading removes your HEAD from your BODY.

    Tough choice!

    ==========

    The Activists that you speak of are ONLY interested in issues that make America look bad.

    btw: the beheadings were Bush's fault.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    What is more brutal, being put to death, or being basically tortured to death, slowly??? I"m pretty sure most warriors would love a quick painless death.......

    Human Activists don't "protest" what terrorists are doing because they assume these people being labeled as terrorists would be enough...???? They pretty much are against anything that ends an innocent's life.......

  • 1 decade ago

    the human rights communities worked a lot in the middle east before 911, if you ever cared to see what amnesty and ant-torture and womens rights groups were about before bush you would know, but with hundreds of thousands dead in iraq after america i guess a few beheadings do not sound so extreme.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyoFwoTQZ6Y&NR=1

  • 1 decade ago

    Since beheading is fatal and waterboarding isn't i'm gonna have to go with beheading.

    I say we kill them all. solve the problems that way.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The guidelines of the Geneva convention should not be broken period.

    Ask anyone who has ever put on a uniform and served this country and they will tell you its wrong and should not have been done.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It is in the liberal agenda.

    The theory is this; Tear down everything that is good or even percieved to be good and elevate everything that is bad until it all reaches some benign, marginal level.

    The expectation is that once everything is marginal, there will be nothing to argue about so their will be nothing to fight about and there will be no war. Everything is so devalued that there is nothing for anyone to envy and then there is no crime.

    The only crime left is the crime of disagreeing with the theory. You go to the gulag for that.

    All explained in detail here --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

    How Modern Liberals Think

    It's long. Put it in your favorites, watch it over coffee then come back here and give me best answer. :)

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Betch'a some kook will say waterboarding.

  • 1 decade ago

    Both is.... And Bush And their administration said No they did not torture any prisoners ..Now we ALL know they did..Im for punishing the terrorist, but we must follow the law... I guess Bush for got about the Law?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.