Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Based on the kind of representation we're getting from our representatives in congress and the senate?
Passing pork infused stimulus packages that they don't even bother to read ( why do we even pay those lazy shits), do you think it's time we made urinalysis testing mandatory for our elected and appointed officials? How often?
FIE, it's at least stimulation without representation.
7 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Weekly, witnessed and no "Wizzinators" (like Tom Sizemore) used.
One time dirty, a week off with no pay/benefits/contact.
(All accumulative, as in ever)
Two times dirty, three months off, no pay/benefits/contact.
Three times dirty, Bye Bye.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Or lack thereof. Yes I am 100 percent behind urinalysis testing for any and all elected and appointed officials. At the very least monthly, but I would prefer weekly.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Maybe more than urinalysis, a mental health exam would be more appropriate. It is clear the US congress needs to be voted out of office in 2010 and I hope people get themselves to the polls and exercise their control by doing just that!
Source(s): experience - 1 decade ago
Yes and they should all go on mandatory diets because they're increasing the cost of healthcare with their own pork bellies.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Happy DaysLv 51 decade ago
If they don't read the bill, isn't that taxation without proper representation?