Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Feminists how does it feel to be the laughing stocks of the world and this board?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/2...

In a later conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo what he thought women's liberation was about. Russo's response that he thought it was about the right to work and receive equal pay as men, just as they had won the right to vote, caused Rockefeller to laughingly retort, "You're an idiot! Let me tell you what that was about, we the Rockefeller's funded that, we funded women's lib, we're the one's who got all of the newspapers and television - the Rockefeller Foundation."

Rockefeller told Russo of two primary reasons why the elite bankrolled women's lib, one because before women's lib the bankers couldn't tax half the population and two because it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model.

This revelation dovetails previous admissions on behalf of feminist pioneer Gloria Steinem (pictured) that the CIA bankrolled Ms. Magazine as part of the same agenda of breaking up traditional family models.

14 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Notice how feminists, once again, cannot answer the question?

  • 1 decade ago

    Why didn't you also mention that the article includes Nick Rockefeller's supposed discussion of how 9/11 and the war on terror was a hoax, that Rockefeller supposedly admits the elite's ultimate plan for the world is population reduction and the elites end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world, a micro-chipped society? Because, maybe this guy would sound kinda paranoid and crazy? And because the article doesn't have any references, except to one guy?

    I've looked for someone other than prison planet and it's author to discuss how Rockefeller supposedly set up the "women's lib" movement, among his other claims, but didn't find any. The link to the article has been copied to a few anti-fem sites, but no one in the media took any of this stuff seriously, but I'm sure it's because the "elites" have control of society and the media..it couldn't be the paranoid rantings of a slightly bent anti-fem, now could it..

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Here we have some more of the conspiracy being unmasked! Including the sinister depopulation agenda which is easily the most farfetched thing I've heard recently. The far Right can't organise their way out of a paper bag, let alone solve the overpopulation crisis by masterminding the feminist movement.

    Suspending sane thought processes for a moment, let us pretend this is true. Isn't this the most pathetic and paltry response imaginable? You finally think you have some confirmation for your paranoid rantings-- the world is going to hell in a handbasket and it's all a giant plot--- and your first impulse is to go on a generic answer board and go "Nyah nyah" at feminists?

    Thanks for a good laugh

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    So I get to earn a little more than 60-cents to a man's dollar and I'm not railroaded into a life of sex-for-procreation-only at the age of 17 - why would that bother me? If feminism had financial backing from the Rockefellers or not (conspiracy theory eye roll) I'm happy with the results thus far. Things could use improvement, though - why don't you get in the kitchen and start doing 50% of the dishes you skurvy man, you?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    The reason your question ticks off women is because some males have a problem with women ( human beings) seeking to be treated as equals. Unfortunately a massive amount of men resist women becoming equals so they resort to rudeness, belittlement, and any other kind of abusive tactic to try and keep us in are place ( lower than men). You calling us laughing stocks is just another way of trying to keep us beneath you. Guess what! Were on to you.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Of course, as usual, feminists can't debate or discuss the topic, so turn immediately to the same tired personal attacks they always turn to. So typical. Like Pavlov's dogs...

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    I've often thought getting more people--women--into the workforce was quite a coup for international corporations--it lowers the cost of labour.

    There are only a few ways to increase profits:

    1) Increase pricing--which only works in a monopoly or a market in which there are only a few major players & they more or less collude on pricing. Otherwise the Marketplace regulates pricing.

    2) Cut costs----raw material costs or labour costs. Labour costs can only be lowered if there is a glut of labour looking for a few jobs. Women in the work force, off-shoring, bringing cheap labour into the US. It's all the same thing.

    Wake up people.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Do I like women in the workplace?? Hell yes. How boring the business world would be if everyone was male.

  • 1 decade ago

    I consider myself to be a dictionary-definition feminist; that is to say, I believe that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. People like Celtish would say this makes me an equalist rather than a feminist, and I'll accept that label too.

    With that in mind, your link has very little to do with my personal beliefs and convictions. If you can't understand that, and choose to laugh at me without actually knowing what I believe, that's ok... I'll be laughing right back at you. ;)

    Edit: Apparently Rebecca W. would like me to laugh at her too. I've happily accommodated her.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You might as well ask how it feels to be a unicorn, something else we would have no idea about. But thank you for playing.

    EDIT: "DABOYS" we DID asnswer, however, our answers were not what you wanted to hear...if you can't stand the heat...you know what to do, Cletus.

  • 1 decade ago

    Strange. I'm the one laughing at this website, which apparently has never heard of a wonderful concept known as the endnote.

  • 1 decade ago

    "Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled [feminism] in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim ..."

    Truth is stranger than fiction.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Eoghan, is this you, having gone totally round the bend?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.