Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Did Holland really just beat England?
how? i mean i know anything is possible but surely even England aren't that crap?
19 Answers
- 1 decade ago
No, it was Netherlands that beat England, but it was a nail biter. I think the England captain should have brought in JM Anderson for the final over instead of Broad. Anderson had 3 wickets already! Plus, his Econ. was way less than Broad's. And Broad just gave away the game. But, I think Ryan ten Doeschate should have been the Man of the Match as he scored a brilliant 22 off 17 balls. Although that was 27 runs less than the Man of the Match Tom de Grooth, Doeschate had 2 wickets while Grooth didn't even bowl.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- jai ho!!™Lv 41 decade ago
it;s not about england being crap it is about holland being good infact better on this occasion.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
No, it's Friday night, and you've been on the waccy-baccy again. Of course not! (says I, blushing through gritted teeth).
- cossyLv 61 decade ago
yep on the last ball ,they won on an overthrow
good game to watch if you like the underdog getting up
- Anonymous1 decade ago
broad should have held the ball, and gotten a super over instead
- 1 decade ago
yes its true and to all english fans pick Pakistan as your team you going to enjoy watching them winning this world cup.