Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

David M asked in SportsRugby · 1 decade ago

Which is more dangerous? Rugby or field hockey?

My daughter is trying to decide if she wants to play tackle rugby or field hockey this summer. She has played both sports and done well.

From an injury perspective, which sport is more dangerous?

Rugby: Last year, two of her rugby team mates ended up with concussions, one with a scratched eye and my daughter's arm got bit (yes, bit) hard enough to bleed.

Field Hockey: Our friend's daughter ended up with a large bruise & swollen lip from getting hit in the mouth with the but end of the hockey stick.

So - Yahooligans - which sport is more dangerous: Rugby or field hockey? Why?

Additional Detail: She would like to play field hockey in the fall for her high school.

Update:

EDIT: Bite: They are supposed to play with mouth guards - ref checks before game - so it is the result of one player's poor sportsmanship.

The concussions were the result of improper tackling (american football 'wrap the arms' approach vs 'wrap around the waist' approach).

My question was intended to find out what other injuries could we expect? Is there a risk that others have experienced that we haven't thought about? If both practices weren't on the same days/times, I'd suggest 'do both' - but looking to others to see what we haven't acounted for as far as risk is concerned.

She's already broken a finger (goalie) and leg (she was a forward - goalie kicked her)playing soccer and continues to play - so we know about any sport posing a risk. Soccer's biggest risk is to the knees - but we still allow both of our girls to play.

Thanks for the great feedback so far!

Update 2:

Q: Does she have a preference?

A: Depends on the time of day and which friend she talked to most recently...she has good friends on each team, just has to make up her mind...if the practices weren't on the same night, we could let her do both.

Update 3:

My line of thinking was along the same lines as "That's not my name". Her high school (grades 9-12) will have a pool of about 800 female students to form the JV and Varsity teams -- and to be honest, I've been quietly hoping she choses field hockey, but want to leave the decision up to her.

She is driven/competitive & wants to play high school field hockey in the fall, swimming & track over the winter, and soccer in the spring...

Her mother and I have to occasionally pull her back because she wants to do too much...

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Mark L
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    At youth-level, I'd guess that field hockey is actually more dangerous. I say that because the youngsters are probably not yet strong enough and skilled enough to properly control their sticks. The damage from the stick - force per unit area - can be very high, especially for high-sticking

    A bit the opposite is true for rugby: The kinetic energy they can develop is 1/2 mv^2, and since they are still young, neither their mass nor their speed is going to be as great as it may be later.

    If these guesses are right, there will come a time when the balance tips the other way - the hockey players will be stronger and more skilled, and therefore play more safely; the rugby players will be bigger and faster, and therefor incur more inherent risk.

    As pointed out above, there are special rules for youth rugby intended to enhance safety, and referees will be especially sensitive to this matter with youth. The critical issue for "safe" rugby will be good coaching - especially for the forwards. Well coached rugby players play safely, because they are well conditioned and well taught in the mechanics. (I'm sure the same is true for hockey.)

    They both are great games - I hope she enjoys either or both.

    Mark L.

    Edit: "Her mother and I have to occasionally pull her back because she wants to do too much..."

    Good for you; sometimes that's needed, and as her parents you are best placed to recognize it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Nowdays especially at youth level, outside the front row there is little chance of serious injury and even in the front row it is greatly diminished with the youth rules around. I have broken my thumb, nose and fractured my eye socket playing rugby, but those were all after I left school. The worst anyone in my teams at school got were raked faces (illegal and only ever when playing a team from a certain school), concussions and rucked backs (back in the day when you could ruck). There are strict rules regarding concussions now to prevent players being rushed back too quickly.

    On saying all of that, there is no way in hell you would ever get me to play field hockey. Kids running around with sticks and a hard ball ... No way, there is a reason in my opinion why the goalies dress like they do. As Mark L says (and he's usually correct) when they're older and more controlled it may be safer, but when my daughters are old enough to play sport, I'll feel much more comfrotable and enjoy watching more if they chose Rugby. I wouldn't stop them playing hockey though.

    Source(s): Does your daughter have a preference?
  • 1 decade ago

    Im In A Wheelchair For 13 Months!!! This Is Because A Scrum Collapsed And I Was Playing Front Row I Usually Play Wing...!!

    FIELD HOCKEY ALL THE WAY

  • blm
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    How the heck does one get bitten playing rugby? Weren't the players wearing mouth guards?

    I can't speak for field hockey, but in rugby the chances (and type) of injury depends on position. But with the exception of front-row scrummers (and there are special rules in place for youth teams for those situations) there isn't a lot more risk of serious injury than in soccer -- usually the result of accidental head collisions or fluke ankle-turnings and such. Of course, in rugby language, cuts, bruises and scrapes don't count as injuries.

    And at least nobody is swinging large pieces of hardwood about.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Ethel
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Don't worry about him. I agree with everything the first guy said, it's a tough sport, but it's not as bad for injuries as you would think. Sure your friend will get bumps and bruise, probably every game, but in three years of playing rugby at the high school and collegiate levels, I have only seen a few serious injuries (torn MCL, broken wrist, and a few concussions) to players on my team. That is far less injuries than I saw to players on the football team I played on for two years. You should watch a game with him sometime and have him explain it. When you know what is going on you will realize that it is not as brutal as it seems, and that it is a lot of fun.

  • 1 decade ago

    field hockey might actually be more dangerous...that is only if not played corretly.

    i say play field hockey because she wants to play it in the fall, so she should take all the practice she can get!

    field hockey = love

  • 1 decade ago

    i think Rugby is Bcuz i've heard about alot of accidents that have happened from it, But i honestly don't know for sure

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Any sport poses a danger, theres no point in thinking of it that way it only casts doubts. Its her decision

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.