Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

DEMOCRACY GOVERNANCE HAS FAILED IN INDIA--CAN PRESIDENTIAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT DO BETTER ?

India could not achieve anything significantly within 65 years of independence because of democratic form of Govt. Can India's fate

change if we opt for presidential form of governance ?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    dear questionnaire

    America's democracy depends on 2 persons and that too atmost for 8 years but the fact is india's advanced then America in this respect because it's democracy depends on one family famously called Gandhi-Nehru family and that too for 65 complete years.

    supporters of Congress like one u seen named as AP name it as this 65 years as golden era of India when still 30% indians are living in poverty and so u r right that we haven't achieved significantly because our parliament are filled up with bunch of illiterate people who do not how to read and write but drives the future of India and its youth.

    so yes it is necessary for us to have presidential form instead of parliament because people will have chance to elect directly the leader instead of electing corrupt intermediate representative.

  • 5 years ago

    the placement in my view is this: In a appropriate international socialism could be appropriate. each and every you may nonetheless do there area and everybody could have their share of the wealth. regrettably, optimal individuals are no longer any further inspired by using doing good for all of guy yet fairly are inspired to learn themselves. The latter is why democracy and capitalism has a lot greater beneficial advance potential. each and every element element seems to be like cycilical. As historic previous repeats itself i could say a solid wager could be some form of totalitarian government could return or possibly a mixture jointly with a democracy at community stages yet totalitarian at federal stages. i could element out I hate how we've replaced the which capability of democracy. we are no longer any further a democracy, we are a respresentative republic. If we've been a democracy every physique could vote to enact regulations on the legislative element, no longer our representatives. in case you think of of our g-ment gets no longer something carried out, think of of ways little an fairly democratic g-ment could get carried out. LOL!

  • 1 decade ago

    i think india has achieved a lot in past 65 years...certainly more than anyother country had when it was our age....remember US was a wreak when it was 62 years...they were all killing each other over slavery,blindly digging for gold and denying women voting rights...

    know your facts

    i think parliamentary form of govt is the best...what is the presidential form of govt but dictatorship by an elected person for 5 years??..imagine if we had presidential form of govt during 1970 emergency and everything..

  • I think you mistakenly wrote India instead of Pakistan? Or you cannot see any significant change in last 62 years? Common man, grow up.... and be matured.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    You want to become parvez musharraf. Do u live in india?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.