Does anyone know how to punctuate this sentence?? It doesn't make sense to me?

Mary, while Joe had10, a better effect on the teacher. J/K

Mary, while joe had, had, had, had, had, had, had, had, had, had, a better effect on the teacher.

What a stupid sentence, this teacher was smoking something. Nothing anyone does will make this right, and it will never come up in daily life or writing.

Mary had what? Joe was what? What teacher? This sentence is meaningless.

It really can't be punctuated, since it's not a sentence. It's just a dependent clause waiting for completion:

Mary, while Joe....had a better effect on the teacher, was better liked in class.

I used ellipticals b/c I'm not writing all the hads.

Mary, while Joe had had had had had had had had had, had a better effect on the teacher.

nicely now, that is exciting. there's a spelling blunders here, which nullifies the entire ingredient. Had you reported, "woman without her guy isn't something" one a probability punctuation could have been "woman! without her, guy isn't something." however the corollary ought to no longer be reported, as that could must be "a woman, without her guy, isn't something." and that introductory particle is lacking. whether, as neither of those suits interior your parameters, there's no longer lots else to do with that sentence.

Mary, while Joe had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

Maybe having a thousand "had" is why it doesn't make sense...

fail