Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

When it says a power plant has a capacity of 50 MW, how does that translate into kWh?

When it says a power plant has a capacity of 50 MW, how does that translate into kWh?

As in is that 50 MW per day, per hour?

Any details would be greatly appreciated.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    You are making a very common mistake. MW and KW are units of power; MWh and KWh are units of energy. You cannot directly convert the two.

    50 MW is equal to 50,000 KW (1 MW = 1000 KW) but to express the term in KWh we need to know the amount of time that has passed. Think of it as KW is total power capacity and KWh is energy used over a certain amount of time.

    "MWh is a unit of energy whereas, MW is a unit of power. Energy and power are two words often confusingly interchanged. Energy is the amount of work done, whereas power is the rate of doing work.

    One MWh (Mega Watt Hour) is a million watts of power applied over the period of an hour. One MW (Mega Watt) is a million watts per second.

    To convert MWh to MW, you should divide MWh by the time applied in hours. MWh = MW / Hours."

  • 6 years ago

    This Site Might Help You.

    RE:

    When it says a power plant has a capacity of 50 MW, how does that translate into kWh?

    When it says a power plant has a capacity of 50 MW, how does that translate into kWh?

    As in is that 50 MW per day, per hour?

    Any details would be greatly appreciated.

    Source(s): power plant capacity 50 mw translate kwh: https://shortly.im/GTXxa
  • ?
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    A kWh is a measure of energy consumption. That is why utility companies charge customers by kWh not kilowatts. A 100 watt bulb left on for 10 hours would be 1 kWh. Simply the product of watts being consumed and the length of time those watts are consumed.

    So, in order to convert 50MW into kWh you would have to state how many hours the 50MW would be used. So 1 hour of 50MW would be 50 MWh or 50,000 kWh. You would get the same answer if you used have the electricity for twice the time... 25MW x 2 hours = 50 MWh = 50,000 kWh. Both examples represent the same amount of electricity consumed, it's just that in the 2nd example it took twice as long to consume that electricity.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Convert Mwh To Kwh

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 7 years ago

    also to understand it outside the numbers, think of it as 50 MW is the nameplate capacity of the plant. But, depending on the energy source, it may or may not produce that much. Sometimes it can even go higher under the right circumstances. In a hydropower plant, the MWhs generated can go above the conversion from MW to MWhs

  • 1 decade ago

    A 50 MW power plant will produce 50,000 kWh worth of energy in one hour.

    1,200,000 kWh in one day.

    438,000,000 kWh in one year

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/axeUr

    1. Yes, capital costs for nuclear are high. But fuel costs are very small. Expensive to build, but cheap to run. 2. Much of the capital cost penalty for nuclear is societal, not technological. In other words, avoidable with policy change. 3. There are no significant improvements on the horizon for concentrated solar. Each piece considered alone is already a mature technology. How much more efficient can you make a mirror? There may be improvements for PV, but that's more expensive than nuclear. 4. Nuclear receives more subsidies than renewables only on a gross basis. On a per-watt basis, renewables are subsidized many times more than nuclear. 5. Nuclear power has advantages that solar and wind do not, specifically near 100% availability. 6. Nuclear has a lower carbon footprint that solar, about as low as wind. 7. Coal burning is the worst, and I mean WORST contributor to global warming on the planet. Period. We still get 33% of our energy from coal, and there's a reason for that. It's RELIABLE and AVAILABLE. Yes, it's killing the planet. But that's not factored into its cost of use. Currently, nuclear power is the only available source for reliable, available baseload electric generation that can realistically hope to replace coal within the next decade. Hydro is already fully subscribed. Solar, wind, and geothermal are regional and intermittant resources. That doesn't mean useless, it just means limited in scope. So yes, let's use wind and solar where we can. Where we can't, use nuclear.

  • 5 years ago

    What is MWe? How much is a 50000 MWe if converted into MW? What is the difference berween the two?

  • 6 years ago

    Your question is understandable.From my knowledge of power systems, eventhough MW is the unit of energy it should be referenced to 1hour. e.g 2000MW simply means it can deliver 2000MW in 1 hour.Thank you

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Megawatt Hour

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.