What reports in peer-reviewed scientific journals support intelligent design?

No established scientific journal has yet published an intelligent design article.

Instead, intelligent design proponents have set up their own journals with "peer review" which lack impartiality and rigor, consisting entirely of intelligent design supporters, because no one else will publish their trash.

I have one. Sort of. It's what Dembski is touting these days.

It doesn't really have anything to do with intelligent design or evolution for that matter.

But it's all they have.

Edit: The paper the nature article mentions is the one that wasn't actually reviewed. The editor of the journal just stuck it in without review. He was promptly fired and the paper retracted.

This event (without the first part) was in the movie Expelled, where they tried to make him out to be the good guy.

Ah, the dishonesty of creationists.

Few creationist manuscripts are submitted because the potential authors are aware that such are unlikely to be accepted. This obtains because you cannot do acceptable science without evidence, and the creationists can't present any. In any event, evolution is now a proven fact, for details, use my avatar to reach an answer to the question "Do you know what a scientific theory is?", which I have put on my Star list.

Your video is very biased. I don't see the evolutionist winning there you cant win an argument by fillibustering. If there is anything to be learned from that video it might be "Nerve argue with a female, They talk too fast."

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v431/n7005/fu...

Nature 431, 114 (9 September 2004) | doi:10.1038/431114a; Published online 8 September 2004

Peer-reviewed paper defends theory of intelligent design

Jim Giles

Top of pageAbstract

Critics of evolution score publishing success

A new front has opened up in the battle between scientists and advocates of intelligent design, a theory that rejects evolution and is regarded by its critics as another term for creationism.A scientific journal has published a paper that argues in favour of intelligent design — the first time such material has appeared in a peer-reviewed publication, according to biologists who track the issue.

I haven't read it i just ran across it on google.

IDiots - what part of "peer-reviewed scientific journals" do you not understand? So why, why, why do you post links to creationist websites and cut and paste sound bites?

You do a brilliant job of making yourselves look very stupid.

Not a single one. I think one of the ID think tanks made something that they describe as a "peer reviewed journal."

No such papers exist.

I love it when the "Scientist" they refer to who support ID have degrees in veterinary medicine or something as unrelated.

They are never molecular biologist, geologist, or a peer of any kind necessary to argue the point one way or the other.

Anyone else heard about microbiologist being found dead a lot lately?

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/deadbiol...

That is like asking Galileo for peer-reviewed scientific journals that support heliocentricity. They didn't exist because all of the scientists and professors believed in geocentrism then. Anything that contradicted it was rejected.

What, are you trying to say that answersingenesis and chick's tracts arent peer reviewed scientific endeavors?

Fundies will be shocked. Just SHOCKED!

first review the peer then peer the review.