Is KERS just a way to legally cheat those who aren't using it?

Emmmm, I don't know how to break this to you Cuz, so I'll be blunt (as usual) The have nots are 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th in the championship! The have nots have won 11 of 13 races this year! so this year its far more productive to be a have not I'd say.

I do agree that optional rules are fundamentally not a good idea, if KERS had been the great invention it was meant to be we could have seen every race dominated by KERS cars, however it was a route open to everyone, Ferrari, McLaren and Renault to an extent spent millions on this idea and have had very little return. In summary I think you've been on the funny ciggies again, but I'm glad your back, you silly bugger!

It is cheating when you are not supposed to do it but you still do it. There is nothing unfair in current KERS rules and it is not entirely for the elites. A 10th of the development budget should do the trick or a group of teams could have collectively contributed to develop and share it.

As a parallel, take another scenario. The mandatory usage of soft and hard compound tires at least once in every race. It is optional to select the order of usage, but does making it an option constitute unfairness?

And I protest the usage of the uppercase "always", from what I see of this season, the KERS cars have been swept over this year, just two wins 13 races so far.

When McLaren, Ferrari, BMW and Renault developed KERS cars, they didn't know that the double-decker diffuser is legal.FIA may want to make the season exciting and perhaps fairer by legalizing the double-decker diffuser. At the end, double-decker diffuser actually makes the car faster than KERS cars.

KERS is actually a 30kg weigh burden to a car. Because of the installation of KERS,the body work of the car cannot be changed to fit with double-decker diffuser.

Red Bull is the only team obey all the rules as they depend solely on the aerodynamic of the car.As a result, they were dominant only in a few races.

I wonder if McLaren and Ferrari redesigned completely the car body to fit KERS and double-decker diffuser next year.These two teams have enough money to do so.

Brawn GP cars don't have KERS and they're running 1-2 in points. I can't begin to explain why an 80hp burst for 6.6 seconds a lap in the KERS cars isn't allowing them to blow away every non-KERS-equipped car on the track, but for whatever reason it isn't.

I'd have a lot bigger problem with some cars having KERS and others not if the KERS cars were winning every race and the non-KERS cars were losing to every race, but since that isn't the case I find KERS to be an interesting technical oddity in an ultra high-tech sport.

formula one is a private company which does what it likes to attract advertisers nothing you read about it in the papers or on TV is the whole truth it is a con. Hasn't it ever occurred to you how unlikely it is that a team that beats everyone one year can't even win points the next, like brawn winning every race then not even being placed then winning again???????????????/

I rather have a different address it. i think that some days the fish chew and a few days they do no longer. And that is not suitable in the event that they see one hundred fish in one spot. that does no longer recommend they are able to capture them. I additionally experience it would not strengthen your capture in any respect. i think the sonar contraptions are a sponsor of the various fishing shows, and the instruct is made to look as though the sonar replace into responsible for the fish capture. that is merely my opinion and others would fluctuate. i take advantage of a fish finder at situations to locate drop offs, underwater shape and verify water depths. you hit upon the form, you could capture the fish.