Jeff Hardy-Character Study of The Charismatic Enigma(Long Question)?

.You're absolutely right.

Why do people have to think of tag teams as "The one with the potential" and "the other one"??

- People are smarks. Straight and simple. They always want to be right. Instead of just enjoying the show, people feel as if they have to sit back and analyze every little detail of the WWE. Why are they doing this? Why are they not? What's the point? Why is WWE missing the point?

I'll use the team of Brian Kendrick and Paul London as an example. Right when they were getting ready to split, everyone started making guesses as to who would be pushed and who would be put on the back burner. Unfortunately, WWE DOES do that a lot. They choose one guy to push with the intention of pushing the other guy eventually, but never really getting around to it. The WWE Universe has recognized that and always tries to analyze who will be the one to get pushed so they can get some sense of self-righteous "I'm better than you" attitude.

Brian was pushed, while London had maybe one match after the split, and was released from the WWE. During that whole scenario, though, the fans would sit there and point out Kendrick's marijuana use or the fact that London broke character to laugh when Vince had the "limo explosion." They always want to be right, just so when their choice gets pushed, they can say "I told you so!"

When Brian got pushed, people were extremely happy. They preferred him over London, I guess. But after a while, people got annoyed with Kendrick's character and whined and cried about how they wanted London to get pushed instead.

Why is Jeff criticised for his drug use but then not realizing that other wrestlers had done it before, in fact almost all had done drugs?

-The bottom line there is, people only see what they want to see. Maybe Eddie Guerrero is their favorite wrestler. I may be pushing a line with this, but Eddie didn't die because of some horrible accident or because of some disease. He died because his past drug use destroyed him. Yet whenever ANYONE mentions Eddie, the only thing they seem keen to remember is everything Eddie did without the drug use.

No matter how you tell the story, the drug use is still there, and unfortunately, the drug use is what harmed him. These people think that because Jeff is not their favorite, then they have all the right to judge him. They look beyond the truth for their own favorite wrestler, but then when it comes to "that other guy", Hardy, they think they can say whatever they want without sounding like the biggest hypocrite on earth.

Why are people assuming if a wrestler comes to the main event he's now classified as "overrated"??

-It happens with basically any wrestler. I remember when everybody was beyond pissed that Randy Orton wasn't making it to the main event. "OH RANDY DESERVES TO WIN!!!" "Why'd they let Triple H win at Wrestlemania? That should have been Orton's night!" Then at the next PPV, Orton wins, and suddenly he's the WWE Champion. Now everyone is whining and crying that Randy didn't deserve to be Champ when they could give it to someone else.

I remember when everyone whined and cried about Kofi never getting anything. He wins the U.S Title and people suddenly stop caring about him. Now they're coming on here to ask why Kofi hasn't lost his title yet.

Why do people oversee things wrestlers have done and just notices if their hated wrestlers make a mistake??

-Same reason as I stated in number two. The people see what they want to see. They act like no one else in the business has done drugs. Honestly, in my opinion, if these people are going to hate a wrestler based on their drug use, then the only wrestler they should watch is CM Punk. But Punk is going to be wrestling people who have used drugs, so they should just stop watching wrestling altogether.

People are hypocrites, bottom line. They see beyond the truth and see what they want to see. They act like it is their position to judge. They call Jeff a spot monkey, when in fact, these same people would piss their pants if asked to do a Swanton off a Titantron.

WQ1: Because tag teams cannot stay as a tag team forever. WWE

breaks tag teams more often because of several reasons but most primarily, WWE needs to change storylines especially when they see that the other guy is more popular than his partner.

WQ2: Sorry Jeff Hardy fans but I see him as a weak person despite his aerial moves inside the ring. He needs to get tougher but he already fell to his addiction which ruins his reputation as a pro wrestler.

People criticize him because they know that Jeff is not a pure wrestler, small, ugly wardrobe yet marketable and he is not concern about his health.

WQ3: Not all but most main eventers do because more kids love them and buy more WWE merchandise and older fans hate that.

WQ4: Because mistakes define the manhood of a wrestler and if everyone talks about the beauty of the wrestler alone, then that will be a "boring" world.

When the team split up it was Matt Hardy Version 1 that looked like he could of been a main eventer. He had the Matt Facts which was the best Titan Tron ever and he had the V1 hand sign deal. He had everything then WWE decided to make him do promos....and just like Bobby Lashley it was clear that interviews were is weakness. Matt's time on ECW as champion was great and the Mark Henry feud was entertaining as was the scramble match.

Outside of being "brothers" tag teams were designed to put two wrestlers who lack certain skills together in hopes that one would be a break out star. Case point Road Dog and Billy Gunn were two random boring low mid card jobbers but together as the New Age Outlaws they were "entertaining".

Well Jeff looked like he was on something all the time....you could see it in his eyes just like Randy Orton.

Emo boy did a good job at putting over the current champion CM Punk....if it wasn't for the feud CM Punk would still be on Raw playing poker with JBL or rubbing noses with Randy Orton.....which would be a huge waste of his talent.

sorry RNW, as cool as you are I do not feel like reading all of that.

to your questions

1. Most likely because they see an instant comparison between the two so immediatly they pick the one who they think is better. For instance if you say Masked NIghtmare and MN Heat in the same sentence you would compare us instantly and note we have MN as shortened names. You would also notice how much more known he is then me, its simple human instinct to compare when seeing two names together.

2. This one is easy, simply because his is more public and recent then others. Sure Rey Mysterio got suspended recently but its still not very public, look at Jeff before he left WWE his past feuds have all mentioned his drug problems. If say HBK was mentioned for his old drug problems I bet it would be the same.

3. I've always been puzzled by that one, it seems there can't be a main event push without people screaming overrated. Very puzzling why people always do that, perhaps just because they don't like who's being pushed. who knows.

4. Its human instinct too immediatly look at the bad before the good. think about it, do you honestly think Michael Vick or OJ Simpson will be remembered for their careers? No way. Simple human nature.

my one and only beef with jeff hardy is the fact he is looked upon as being cool by little kids even though he does drugs. he's not that good on the mic, i think michael cole does a better job with the mic than hardy.

so there you go.

my question is why do people still support jeff hardy but when they see the name of Chris Benoit (who was inarguably 100x better than hardy ever could be) they freak out?

Yeah well unlike Masked Imbecile I read it. Agree completely. You may know I'm a huge Jeff fan but I did lose respect for Jeff this time he got busted. It was the fact that it was his 3rd time he was caught, he should of learned his lesson but he failed. He couldn't even last 2 weeks away from WWE without taking substances.

Jeff on the IWC is hated. Due to 70% of the IWC being ignorant face bashing dullards.

I was planning on writing more than you. But my fingers ache. So mm this is it. My answer. Shaamoosh.

First of all, what the hell possessed you to type all that? Now, to your question, i don't know why people criticize Jeff. He's a good wrestler and people need to give him a chance. i mean, a lot of wrestlers have done drugs or any illegal substances. I don't think that wrestlers are overrated when they make a main event appearance. it just shows that some wrestlers are simply better than others. People oversee the good things wrestlers have done because they don't see them. People like CM Punk( still love you!!!) think that they are better and don't see the accomplishments other people have done! Hope you like this answer!!

TL;DR

Jeff is a druggie.

In b4 butt hurt fan girls.

There's no way in hell I'm reading all of that.