Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How can a world that is the product of...?

...blind, purposeless, random natural processes account for and justify the crucial conditions that make the scientific enterprise possible?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Bruce
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Good question. A world that is an accidental product of blind, purposeless, random natural processes could hardly be the designer earth in which an intelligent, rational species with free will develops scientific knowledge.

    Astronomy is a perfect example. The manifold "coincidences" that permit astronomy defy an explanation of chance. We live in a spiral galaxy out in an arm, allowing an examination of other galaxies. Our planet has a transparent atmosphere. The moon perfectly conceals the sun in a solar eclipse.

    And of course, the greatest "coincidence" of all is that somehow inanimate matter morphed into human agents capable of astronomy.

    I don't have enough faith to be an atheist.

    Cheers,

    Bruce

  • Agena
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    The answer usually given is to invoke the "Anthropic principle" in the form which can be stated as: "If it hadn't happened that way, we wouldn't be here, but it did, so we are,", usually, I'm afraid, followed by an unspoken "Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah".

    If all teleological arguments are rejected a priori, this suffices.

    My personal view is that intelligence was somehow involved, just not IAW Genesis 1 and 2 as written. I sometimes outrage both sides in arguments about this by remarking, "Oh, no, God produced us by a special act of creation, using cheap, readily available, off the shelf monkey parts".

    Source(s): A good overview: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle Deeper philosophy: http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/tele... Deals with "anthropic reasoning", a separate problem: http://www.anthropic-principle.com/
  • 1 decade ago

    in the scientific community, all the reasoning or inventions or discoveries are enclosed and backed by a strong and perfect theory or the way the people could understand it more easily.... also the reasoning inside everyone asks for a better reason to accept what it wants to accept....

    Source(s): my knowledge
  • 1 decade ago

    Not random. Selection is natural but is very non-random.

    This is a common creationist argument, and fallacious for the reason I stated.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    To be, or not to be, that is the question. If you are, you ask questions, if you are not, then who cares.

  • 1 decade ago

    I agree with Paul (all the cool guys are named Paul).

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.