Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What's atheist and philosopher of science Bradley Monton's motive for supporting Intelligent Design?
Is his motive just another religious attempt to wedge Young Earth Creationism into our school classrooms, or might there be a motive for the benefit of science itself? I'm still puzzled as to why an atheist would support the Intelligent Design enterprise. Why?
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/...
@Transitional Species, even us Christians agree with that quote. If he doesn't support it, then why did he title his latest book 'Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design'?
I don't blame skeptics for lumping Young Earth Creationism with Intelligent Design since ID doesn't take a strong enough stand against YEC. However, it needs to be stated that ID doesn't argue for any particular designer. Hey, it could be aliens! ;-)
@Transitional Species, its true that in the end of his book he remains unconvinced. However, Dr. Monton still supports Intelligent Design as a potential scientific hypothesis. It's pretty interesting to note that while he remains unconvinced by the ID arguments, he admits that some of them makes him doubt his atheism.
7 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
The way to refute intelligent design is not by declaring it unscientific, but by showing that the empirical evidence for design is not there.
- Bradley Monton
Doesn't sound much like to support to me.
EDIT
Have you read the book or just the title? Monton doesn't believe ID is true, just that it deserves to be tested as a scientific hypothesis and not disregarded out of hand as unscientific. Monton however is a philosopher and not a scientist. Personally I think it should be treated as mumbo jumbo and nothing more.
- 1 decade ago
I think you would have to read his book to understand.
It is hard to argue that there is NO design in nature, intelligent or not.
BTW: calling an atheist a Young earth Creationist may be a misnomer. This is an Appeal to Ridicule logical fallacy.
- ⌡Machine Head⌠Lv 71 decade ago
Never heard of him. Maybe that's why he's doing it: He can't get noted for the quality of his work so he adopts a shock value stand.
It's been known to happen.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
He believes in aliens.
- BlackacreLv 71 decade ago
Damned if I know. As there isn't evidence of magical sky fairies, ID really isn't on a sound basis...
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Is he trying to flog a book to American Christians?