Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

how are our political parties able to have such loose structure as opposed to those in a parliamentary system?

is it as long as candidate has the basic fundamentals of the party, he or she can consider themselves democratic or republican? and what are the basics of each party?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    In a parliamentary system, especially one with proportional representation (boo! hiss!), you can have a party for anything, from the Free Cake party to the Dog Raper party. When members of these parties assemble in parliament, they negotiate until a coalition is formed that represents a majority of the members.

    In the US, most elections require a candidate to get over 50% of the vote in their area, thus they have to be more inclusive of the diverse view of their constituents. Traditionally, the Democrats are for higher taxes, higher government spending, and moral relativism. The Republicans are (supposed to be) for lower taxes, smaller government, and defending the values of the nation's Founders. When the Repubs were in power recently, they did a crappy job of that, so the nation fired them and hired Obama and Nancy Pelosi. Now the nation sees that Obama is worse, so in 2010, the power in the Congress will go back to Republicans, and a Republican will be elected President in 2012.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    quite. They remind the two activities that there are distinctive recommendations for voters. on a matching time as a 0.33 social accumulating has via no ability outright gained a presidential election they have been to blame for who gained. Ross Perot pulled away sufficient Republican votes that Clinton gained and Ralph Nader pulled away sufficient Democrat votes that Bush gained. in the event that they did not exist the effect of those 2 elections would have been relatively distinctive. Or inspect Joe Lieberman. at the same time as the Democratic social accumulating grew to grow to be their backs on him and nominated a a procedures left loon to run for the senate, Lieberman ran as an autonomous and gained via utilising fact optimum individuals of voters like his place better suited. and not utilising a 0.33 social accumulating determination the social accumulating would desire to come to a sort who runs and not the persons.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.