What are the main arguments against the universal (single payer) health insurance in the US?

Factually people prefer philosophical rhetoric usually spewed by a near-sighted or narrow minded propagandist.

For any American to walk into a clinic and receive free medical care because the government has nationalized health care, is such a paradigm shift that it cannot easily be passed.

Also the government is such a bureaucratic backwater mire that government agencies often fail to reach full potential and in fact become top-heavy, money-sucking failures.

Why the hell did cost of stamps rise so sharply but the freaking machine is usually broke?

Why are politicians designing a health care plan instead of doctors, nurses and hospital administrators telling Congress how insurance companies are lowering standard of health care and raising cost?

Unfortunately, the main arguments against it are not based on facts. For instance, Ice T's answer implies that all national health care systems work like England's and Canada's. It refuses to consider all the countries where it does work very well, like Japan, Germany, Sweden, etc., etc., etc. It is also based on the ignorance of statements that the US's health care is so great people come from all over the world for treatment, when the truth is that the only people who come here are able to afford care that many Americans do not have access to. It ignores facts like if you live in Las Vegas and have no insurance, you get no cancer treatment. It also ignores the fact that more and more Americans ARE going abroad for care that they cannot afford here.

People are very attached to keeping things the same, even if they aren't as good as something else. Change is very scary for them and they just don't want to hear it.

It doesn't work too well! You simply have to look at countries that have it and you will see high taxes, health care rationing, long wait times, poor quality, and bureaucrats deciding on what care you will receive! In England they actually had to pass a law saying that if you went to the emergency room you had to be seen within 5 hours! To get around this law English hospitals park ambulances in the parking lot and make people wait there because they are not in the emergency room they do not have to be seen within the 5 hour limit! Recently the English health regulatory committee has said that a major drug used in breast cancer treatment would no long be available in England because of it's cost. This ruling essentially has sentenced several women to death!

Look at Canada if it is so great please explain why so many Canadians come to the US for treatment while no American goes to Canada for treatment!

I have friends and family in both Canada and Germany so I first hand experience with single payer systems and not much of it is good!

That's going to be hard, finding reasoned statements (with out rhetoric or ideology), for or against universal insurance, but especially against. The benefits of the free market is the crux of many arguments against universal health care.

Its all with regard to the $$$$$$$ if those expenses are no longer under administration Xerox would be busy making printing to inflate are way out of well being-care undertaking. First, corporation based assurance is regressive with the aid of fact the the precise tax brackets get tax write of 35% for each one hundred money of coverage. besides, the well being care reform is purely no longer debate approximately public verse inner maximum coverage its gonna be approximately $$$$ money. Republican party the president have been given the cheap reconciliation which skill he will ram it via congress while not having 60 votes. Please, attempt to be bipartisan with well being care we don't desire fifty one vote government public plan. besides, if the congressional budget workplace or CBO does not supply the ok than switched to the empathasis to government debt and blue dogs democrats will vote no for healthcare reform. If the CBO supplies the ok for it to be budget impartial then you extra suitable be bipartisan with the aid of fact public option would be exceeded with fifty one votes with budget reconciliation. the end result's you're starting to be goverment interior of 5 years controlling 70% of the well being care marketplace. objective is forestall nationalization by stealth, yet whilst nicely-known is performed by a regulated inner maximum marketplace its extra suitable than nationalized healthcare plan. CBO numbers is top right here its all approximately $$$$