Whats with the discrimination---> Adam Lambert?

I agree. It's not like he's the first person to ever do a shocking performance. Does anyone remember the Britney/Madonna/Christina kiss or Marilyn Manson's bare butt :) 2 years in a row? Of course, all of that was on the VMAs,though. Maybe it wasn't so much the performance, but the venue. Had he done all of that on Mtv, people probably wouldn't have even batted an eyelash and if they did freak out, then it would've been discrimination because they allow everything else. But considering that it was on a non-cable channel on a family-friendly show, I guess that one's kind of hard to call. Maybe it was just the wrong time and place. I don't know. i hope that's all it was, though.

But,regardless, I loved the performance. And straight or not, I thought the kiss was HOT! :p

It was a sad attempt at gaining attention. Yea MTV shows stupid **** all the time but this was on a family network. Parents who don't normally let their younger kids watch mtv might have thought it was ok to watch these award shows considering it was ABC. Only to find some moron trying to make his lame performance into some soft core porn vid. It's not about discrimination and i'm soooo over people ALWAYS trying to use that as an excuse for EVERYTHING. It's about acting appropriate and like you have a little bit of class...

and for the record carrie underwood and lady gaga's (as much as i cant stand gaga) performance was NOT raunchy. I'm pretty sure i didnt see them walking people around in bondage comstumes and shoving peoples heads in their crotches while grinding...get over it lambert is pretty sad. I mean really come on..what he couldnt make a name for himself by just singing well he had to act like an idiot to get people talking?

I can't believe 1500 people complained to abc about his performance being raunchy. I have seen MUCH worse. Why didn't anyone complain about Carrie Underwood's raunchy performance or Lady Gaga? Lady Gaga looked completely naked with that nude colored outfit she wore. I think Adam Lambert's performance sucked because I didn't like his singing. It had nothing to do with the raunchiness of it.

Tiger Woods- a protection gadget for his telephone so as that his spouse can not wreck into his voicemail anymore. Adam Lambert- some extra remarkable eyeliner. invoice Gates- A fruitcake by using fact he would desire to purchase something else if he particularly needed it.

i don't get it either

i understand that yea his performance was a bit weird and strange but people are just going mental over it! i think its not that big of a deal..

i dont care what you say.

THAT SHIIT IS GROSS.

THE AMAs IS A FAMILY SHOW.

I SHOULDNT HAVE TO COVER MY 5 YEAR OLD MALE COUSINS' EYE BECAUSE OF SOME GAY SHIIT ON TV.

th gays can be the most loving happiest coolest, and FUNNIEST people out there.

but WHEN THEY START DOING THAT SHIIT ON TV ON A FAMILY SHOW.

THEY NEED TO GET SLAPPED.

Hey, that's the only way for him to become famous, to gather attention, because, obviously, he can't do it using his shitty music.

Anyway, I don't get it too.Since when being BISEXUAL/GAY is COOL?