Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
No tax increase for top earners?!?
How the hell are they going to pay for this....?
Fellow liberals.... are you as angry as I am? Maybe I am overreacting???
AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! I certainly hope they aren't thowing the working class under the bus with this...
12 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
What have you done for me lately? I don't recall you ever helping me achieve success.
I already pay far more taxes than you make, so why should I pay more?
At least I can say the money I earn keeps people employed, how many people do you employ?
You seem think people with money don't actually contribute to society, yet I have to wake up every morning to make sure the people who work for me still have a job so they can feed their families and pay their bills.
- electricpoleLv 71 decade ago
Is that the motive of the Left in this issue, to get some one else to pay for it?
$500K is NOT always what it seems. Most , yes most individuals making that much are not the few high profile idle rich, they are professionals with unique skills or people like you and me (or at least me) who work 7 days a week for years to obtain that kind of income, and have expenses in overhead that takes 60%+ of it away well before they see profit, IF they see profit.
It is a statement of where we are as a nation that so many individuals advocate taking as much as possible from successful, motivated producers. It indicates to me that a significant number of people have no intention of attempting success on their own, as they would not wish to have such confiscatory policies if they did plan on "arriving" some day.
- ?Lv 44 years ago
easily, no. in case you look at history, the choice is authentic. right this is why. while the wealthy provide, they take the tax deduction. while the tax value iis (in basic terms for occasion) 20% and that they provide $1000 it expenses them$800. If the tax value rises to 40%, a similar givft in basic terms expenses $six hundred. So the wealthy easily provide extra while the tax value rises--using fact it expenses them much less to furnish!. human beings do save music of those issues --and in case you look on the history of charitable giving, that's what easily occurs.
- MikeGolfLv 71 decade ago
The reason why they are no gong to use a tax increase on 'top earners' to pay for Obamacare is that doing this cannot raise the necessary amount of money.
The only way to pay for Obamacare is to tax the middle class. (And the tax on healthcare benefits and healthcare equipment is a tax whose costs will be directly passed on to the consumers of medical services.)
.
Source(s): Besides - what moral right do you have to their money anyway? - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- JudicatorLv 61 decade ago
If you punish businesses too much they will leave, and Obama has been given the task of reducing unemployment. This issue is dire for him to have a chance at reelection
You can't hold both goals and expect to accomplish both.
- 1 decade ago
Why do you liberals have to punish hard work and success may I ask? Isn't it their right to have the money they worked for, instead of having people being worthless and not having jobs and living off the government?
- MoltarRocksLv 71 decade ago
DC math doesn't add up anyway. We simply have to stop spending what we don't have and cannot possibly raise.
Source(s): http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/