Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If I(n)=-n * I(n-1) deduce that I(n) = (-1)^n * n!?
where I(n) initially = 0∫1 (lnx)^n dx
2 Answers
- nealjkingLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
UPDATE:
Hemant: To be honest, I don't see that you have added any content beyond what I had originally posted; which is below:
============================================
============================================
Let's first look at the original problem:
L(n) = ∫ (ln(x) )^n dx , [x = 0,1]
Integrating by parts,
L(n) = x*(ln(x))^n - ∫ x * (1/x)(n*(ln(x))^(n-1) dx , [x = 0, 1]
...... = x*(ln(x))^n - n * ∫(ln(x))^(n-1) dx , [x = 0, 1]
...... = (0 - 0) - n*L(n-1)
because x dominate ln(x) when x=> 0.
Therefore, as you stated:
L(n) = - n * L(n-1)
Before we can deduce what L(n) is, we have to have a starting point. In particular, does L(1) exist?
L(1) = ∫ ln(x) dx , [x = 0,1]
...... = x*ln(x) - x , [x = 0, 1]
...... = 1*0 - 0 - 1 = -1
So L(1) exists and = -1; and this matches the formula, because (-1)^1 * 1! = -1.
Now it is straightforward:
L(1) = -1
L(2) = -2*L(1) = +2
L(3) = -3*L(2) = -3*2
L(4) = -4*L(3) = +4*3*2
Obviously, it works. More formally, we would prove it by induction:
If L(n) = (-1)^n * n! for n = m, and
L(m+1) = -(m+1)*L(m), then
L(m+1) = -(m+1)*(-1)^m * m!
........... = (-1)^(m+1) * (m+1)*(m!)
........... = (-1)^(m+1) * (m+1)!
So if it works for m, it works for m+1.
Since we know it works for m = 1, that implies that it works for all integers 1 and above.
QED
- HemantLv 71 decade ago
UPDATE :
Nealjkin... frankly, i haven't read your solution.
I had just cast a casual glance at your solution and
those m and m+1 gave me the impression that you were
using the method of mathematical induction. So I shot off
my own solution.
...........................................................................................
Let : I(n) = - n. I(n-1) ... (1)
Then,
I(n-1) = -(n-1). I(n-2)
I(n-2) = -(n-2). I(n-3)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
I(3) = -3. I(2)
I(2) =- -2. I(1)
I(1) = -1. I(0) = - 0â«1 ( ln x )° dx = - 0â«1 (1)dx
....................= -[x] on [0,1]
....................= - [ 1 - 0 ]
....................= -1.
Hence, combining all these equations backwards, i.e.,
using I(1) in I(2), ... I(2) in I(3), ... , I(n-1) in I(n),
I(n) = (-n)[-(n-1)].[-(n-2)].[-(n-3)]. ... (-3).(-2).(-1)
...... = [ (-1)(-1)(-1) ... n times ].[ 1.2.3. ... (n-1).n ]
...... = (-1)ⁿ. n! ................ Q.E.D.
...............................................................................................................................
Happy To Help !
..........................................................................................................................................