Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Everything equal - would you apply your tax return to your IRA for 2009 or 2010?
If you were going to contribute your 2009 income tax return to your Roth IRA would you make it a 2009 contribution or 2010 contribution?
How would you make that decision - based on what criteria? (Assume you have not already contributed to your cap for 2009.)
Thanks.
3 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
A traditional IRA has the possibility for a tax deduction in the year of the deduction, but withdrawals are taxed. A roth IRA does not have the tax deduction, but withdrawals are not taxed.
Another rule with roths that if you withdraw the money within 5 years of the contribution, there is a 10% premature distribution penalty for doing so. it ALWAYS will make sense to contribute in the last tax year just in case you need the money 4 years from now.
Source(s): 3 years in financial services and FINRA licences 6 and 63. - ?Lv 71 decade ago
You need to look at your bracket. If you feel that your income in 2010 will be high enough so that most money will be in the higher bracket, then apply the IRA to 2010. If you feel that your earnings in 2010 will be the same as 2009, then apply the IRA to 2009.
- Nifty BillLv 71 decade ago
I would you rather contribute for 2009. You can get an immediate return on your refund at your tax rate. And hopefully in 2010 you will go ahead and add more. It probably doesn't matter though, you probably won't be able to do you 2010 cap unless you are debt free.