Can you against evolution without using a single logical fallacy?

Consider this

Mysteries In Science

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5725394906...

The Young Age of the Earth

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/faith_a...

The Origin of Man by Dr. Duane Gish

http://www.strimoo.com/video/14877425/The-Origin-o...

Skull Fossils - As Empty as the Evolutionary Theory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Yu5jN897kM

Neanderthals - Smarter Than We Thought

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxL636n3w2o

Creation In The 21st Century - Our Young Moon 1 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i3jtYx7NMk

The "Dark Cloud" of the Big Bang

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8903287973...

Why do creationists feel sorry for delusionists?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d4b_1214585502

Today's World Population Debunks Evolution- Dr. Carl Baugh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWxqzNM76jE

Creation In The 21st Century -- Noah's Ark and Jesus 1 of 3 (Parallel)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQg67H4GK1o

I already know you will reject any answers by creationist, but since I am bored, I will play your game.

Here is a proof that is known to be a fact.

Carbon-14 will take about 30,000 years to equalize. The rate of input from the sun is the same as the rate loss to decay. Both sides agree with this.

Evolutionists say that since the Earth is much older then 30,000 years, carbon-14 is stable, and can be used to date some thing.

Creationists actually measured the amount a few times, once in the 1950, once in the 1980, and a third time in the early 2000, and saw that it is still increasing, and is only 1/4 to 1/3 of the way to equilibrium. This shows that the Earth is less the 10,000 years old, so there is no way that anything can be older then that.

Older dates are gotten by using methods that have a 100% failure when testing items of predetermined dates, and more then 50% failure when multiple tests were done on different parts of the same item.

Something tells me you already know the answer...they cannot. So, good question.

The most infuriating aspect of the creationism argument is when they say "there's no evidence" or "show me the evidence". This fails for two reasons...one, they are ignoring the evidence, which anyone can plainly see if they go to a legit natural history museum. And two, the irony is astounding...they demand evidence for evolution, yet they are perfectly willing to argue that god exists with zero evidence.

Actually your assumption that every single creationist argument ever made by every creationist has been a logical fallacy is in itself a logical fallacy. (Over-generalization).

All those logical fallacies are used against creation as well. The science is the same, the difference is in the interpretation of the evidence. It is certainly possible to look at the evidence and come up with a different conclusion to the Darwin evolutionary position. Indeed, many would see that the evidence fits perfectly well with a design position. Even Richard Dawkins in his anti-creation book The Blind Watchmaker admits “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” In other words its science vs science.

Marriage is an outdated institution. It emerged as a way to control women as property. It is promoted as part of an ideology that includes subjectively valid ideals about what it means to be a family and about how people are supposed to carry out sexual relationships that is repressive to individuality and enforces social standards ultimately designed to help the capitalist wage slave system. Since we should get rid of marriage itself we should ultimately get rid of ALL marriage, gay and straight. I don't think we should keep gay marriage illegal while straight marriage is still legal but I think it would be a more positive development if we just banned straight marriage to make it equal instead of legalizing gay marriage. note: you could still call yourselves married(free speech means you can call yourself what ever you want really), just no government benefits. There are even some countries like Lebanon that do not have civil marriage.

I have always been close to my Pikachu, but recently I have been considering evolving him into a Raichu so that he can learn all of the upper level moves. Also, my Pikachu doesn't even listen to me anymore because his level is to high and I don't have the Cascade Badge. This has been tearing me up inside because our bond was strong in the early episodes. I believe that this will be the most important decision of my career.

Good question for theists. I'd like to see some of their answers. Star for you!

Edit: Israel- sure you had one fact about Carbon 14 in there, but the rest was just a bunch of drivel. Know why? Because Carbon 14 isn't the ONLY way to measure and C14 dating will be INACCURATE if you use it INACCURATELY. Might want to study up a bit more on other methods of dating before making yourself look uneducated (like just now).

I hardly doubt that any creationist is able to win this argument because they all rely on using logical fallacies in their argument against evolution.

Edit:

Trivia Jockey

Love your last sentence

I would not presume to argue against evolution, it is fact and it continues. God is fact and however He has chosen to create this world is what we now witness.

I hit level 16 and had my first evolution yesterday. I'm much bigger now and I also learned flamethrower and firespin. It's just another step to be the very best. The best there ever was. To catch them is my real test, to train them is my cause.