Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How about Judge Judy for the Supreme Court?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    She's a little too smart to be a Supreme Court Justice...besides, why on EARTH would she take such a huge cut in pay?

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Judy is an arbitrator (a individual chosen to settle the situation between events engaged in a dispute). you're able to desire to place a gown on your around the corner neighbor then sign a paper to enable them to settle your dispute. It basically seems greater effective for television in case you get any former choose. whilst Judy yells pay it, and/or judgment in the quantity of, "she is mendacity". massive value ticket Productions will pay the winner. The loser under no circumstances will pay a dime in spite of if the quantity isn't what replaced into initially sued for there is not any stability due! JJ isn't a court docket of regulation, it particularly is a television prepare! Their intent is to make it appear like a court docket proceeding. there is not any sparkling up front disclaimer telling visitors that vast value ticket Productions will pay any and all monies Judy awards. The objective industry contributors are particularly extras (actors) to utter loud gasps on cue. in case you are the only being sued, you could not lose any money. Judy does not shop on with any state regulation (the arbitration contract is basically filed in CA). Judy in basic terms follows her thought of elementary experience , which adjustments on a daily foundation. There are no rules of knowledge. No precise of attraction. No criminal rules Judy has to maintain on with. base line is: all of us could be an excellent choose in the event that they weren't actual required to maintain on with perfect technique.

  • 1 decade ago

    What the former judge who now has a show where she's an arbitrator but seems to have forgotten how to apply the law?? No.

    But I would put up Judge Marilyn Milian for the job!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    How about NOT? How about we keep the current justices for a long while and not put mainstream icons into important political positions. Remember what happened last time? Cali?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    She is not eligible. She isn't a real judge. She is acting as a mediator per mutual agreement of the show participants.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes! Better than Sonya Mayor, that's for sure!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.