Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Do we need to fight back against cuts to public services and against privatisation?
All the main parties are going to slash public services when they are elected. The only party which is standing up for ordinary people and has a track record of militant action is TUSC.
What do you think of their policies? Can we fight back against cuts and privatisation of our public services - NHS hospitals being closed, libraries being shut, social services being cut, attacks on benefits and welfare, on students? Do our public services need to be cut, while the rich still get away with tax avoidance and non-doms stash their wealth in tax havens?
See below:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_20...
http://www.tusc.org.uk/policy.php
Is it time to vote for a real alternative, with honest, fighting MPs on the same wages as those they represent?
If I was living where Respect were standing, I would vote for them. In many places, Respect supporters are voting TUSC.
See below:
Shevek - I completely agree! This isn't enough at the moment - TUSC are only standing in 42 constituencies, but overall the hard left is standing in over 90.
Where there is a socialist / trade union / good left wing candidate - please vote for them.
NLV - if the public sector is so inefficient, why is it that in 1979, before Thatcher's internal market damaged the NHS, admin costs were 6% - now they are 12% and rising.
6 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
What we need is a real socialist alternative to all the existing parties. At the moment in the UK there is no major political organisation that is anti-capitalist, represents the interests of working people and provides a realistic electoral alternative.
All the professional politicians are in favour of "free" market solutions to the current economic crisis. All are determined that it will be the ordinary, law-abiding, tax paying citizen who will pay for the greed and fraud perpetrated by the financiers, bankers, and the boys and girls on the world stock exchanges. In the States Goldman Sachs is being investigated for fraudulent practises. Why are not the financial institutions in the UK under investigation?
The likes of the Trades Union and Socialist Alliance and Respect are only the seeds of an electoral alternative.
Check out this blog for a list of left candidates in the UK:
- 1 decade ago
Yes.
Do, for instance public sector employees, like the people who work in Jobcentres get these 'work benefits'?
25 days' annual leave
A double-matched Stakeholder pension scheme
PruHealth private healthcare
Dental cover with Denplan
Income protection (in the event of long-term illness)
Life insurance
An Employee Assistance Programme (confidential BUPA advice line)
Enhanced maternity and paternity leave packages
Childcare vouchers (tax savings for working parents)
Give As You Earn scheme (tax-free donations to charities)
This is what a company called Ingeus offer. They are one of the many growing private companies in the booming 'welfare to work' industry which the Jobcentres are increasingly using to deliver flexible New Deal, employment zone type programmes to persuade unemployed people to look even harder for non existent jobs.
- 1 decade ago
Still reeling myself from recently finding out about fractional reserve banking, a breathtaking fraud which steals astronomical sums directly from the public and indirectly by stealing public, taxpayer's, money. The government only makes about 3% of money the banks make the rest, they conjure it into existence when someone takes out a 'loan'. This enables power to control the direction of society.
To give one example, if gets far worse: Government borrows money from the banks; bank employee types money into the government's account (strictly speaking it is not in a sense money at this stage); government pays interest on the money. These interest payments are immense. If government employee typed in the money the government would not have to pay interest out of the public purse and we could afford 3 extra health services.
Sounds insane - this protects them: recall Hitler's discussion of the big lie - but it's true.
It gets worse.
Source(s): Money As Debt, a cartoon film: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-255015645... Money As Debt II a more correct follow up. - telwiditLv 51 decade ago
Yes! We should fight back because I believe cuts should be made elsewhere. Cut some of the single service contracts used to build unneeded military planes and ships. We need to replenish our infrastructure in the United States. Bridges need to be re-enforced, roads need to be repaired and resurfaced, etc. Further studies and implementing of new energy sources.
As long as the oil interests are still around and influencing congress the less will be spent toward new energy.
thanks
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- nlvLv 61 decade ago
Not really Andrew, the UK can't afford public sector pensions at the moment & the public sector is inefficient compared to the private sector. (There is no reason why it should be but it is).
Edit "Unfunded public sector pension
liabilities are now estimated to exceed £1 trillion, over 70 per cent of GDP."
Edit that's a question for the labour party, 6% is sort of OK, 12% out of order.
The issue is the public sector has been ineffecient as I said there is no reason for it to be.
Please respond to how the UK will pay 70% of GDP for public sector pensions! It's a time bomb that will cripple the UK!
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If you feel that way vote Respect Party.