Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Creationists, do you find some of the most close minded in the evolution controversy turn out to be Catholics?

I am a Creationist and a Catholic myself and this has been a great disappointment to me. While atheists on this forum do themselves no favors either, their viewpoints are to be expected and in personal conversations I have found most of them to be very cordial and respectful (even open minded). On the other hand, several Catholics (and theists) who believe in evolution that I have been in contact with have been very arrogant, derogatory and disrespectful in their communications and in their forum answers. I know I am generalizing and the vast majority of Catholics I know are wonderful Christians (after all, I am Catholic myself) and many have a creationist viewpoint. However, it's been my personal experience that this is not the case for those that believe in evolution on this forum . Anyone have similar experiences? If so, why do you think this is the case?

Please note: The official position of the Catholic Church accepts a creationist view. However, they do not agree with evolution unless it is acknowledge that God created the universe from nothing and that the evolutionary process was guided by God. This, of course, is in direct conflict with leading proponents of evolution who insist that the process can proceed by only natural means and does not require external supernatural influence.

Also, I've tried to be very respectful with my question. If this gets deleted, it will be further evidence to support my contention.

Update:

goodluckwiththat - This is just what I mean. You say "I don't understand why any self-proclaimed Christian would deny [evolution]...I cannot believe that you [believe in Adam and Eve]...I cannot believe that any learned Catholic would [take the bible literally]". It may have been unintentional on your part, but you just called me stupid. True, this is mild compared to many responses I have received, so I will not hold it against you.

Vilhelm - Yes, I believe I am open minded. I have investigated origins theories over many years and I have found NO empirical evidence for evolution. It is simply an atheist philosophy. Since I am open minded, I research any new arguments I hear and invariably find that they are nothing but materialistic story telling with no real evidence to back them up. On the other hand, I find significant empirical, observable and repeatable evidence for creation theory. I believe that any open minded person would come to the same conclusion.

Update 2:

St. Paul - Good answer. You've hit upon a controversial issue, but you've mischaracterized evolution. Although scientists are just discovering that the environment is actually capable of altering the genetic code (or more precisely triggering changes in single individuals which can then be passed to offspring), the official position of evolution is that it is completely undirected. That is, changes are the result of completely RANDOM genetic mutations (or copying mistakes), which have no idea what the organism "needs" and which are then selected for by natural selection. Nevertheless, you are still correct. Random mutations have been shown to be completely incapable of adding the information required to change a molecule into a man.

Update 3:

Iamacatholic2 - Thank you for your response and all the links. I have often heard the quote "truth cannot contradict truth". Invariably the Catholics I've debated about this will admit that because they believe that science has "proven" evolution to be true, then God's Word must be re-interpreted. Why? How about assuming God's Word is true and re-interpret evolution instead? You see we all have the same evidence. Evidence doesn't talk. It must be interpreted. Truth cannot contradict truth. Therefore evolution must be false and God's Word true.

Update 4:

Cirbryn - So because someone is not as smart as you, then it's ok to denigrate them? Nevertheless, no, I consider myself highly intelligent and well educated and have research this topic for many years (I won't say how many!). I believe my arguments to be well grounded with lots of evidence to back them up. If you want examples, here are a few from a debate I just had with a Catholic (supposedly a Christian). He called me and other creationists "crazy" and "liars" who only provide "distortions and misinformation" and that I was absorbing "crap" from "fundies" and that I was "in denial of reality", "deceived", "totally ignorant", had a "narrow mind" , a "charlatan", "twisted and stupid", "laughable", "delusional", "confused", "a cult member" and "in serious need of psychological help". And this is the tip of the iceberg. Is that enough for you?

Update 5:

And yes, the Catholic church DOES accept a CREATIONIST viewpoint. Either creation or evolution is fine with them. They are very pluralistic. I would not be a Catholic if they outright rejected creation science.

Cirbryn, you need help with your logic. If evolution "doesn't require supernatural influence", then it MUST proceed by natural means alone! If you have knowledge of some other influence that is neither natural nor supernatural, I'd like to hear it. Indeed, 87% of leading evolutionists are atheists. You don't think this influences their interpretation of the evidence?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I am a Catholic who believes that God, being all-powerful, is more than able to allow evolution and the Big Bang to have taken place. I don't understand why any self-proclaimed Christian would deny this. I have taught both evolution and the Big Bang in Catholics schools. I never mentioned God during my lessons because, I think, it was a moot point. It was a given that "of course God was responsible for it." I do not believe that Adam and Even actually existed nor do most theologians. I cannot believe that you do. I believe the scientists who have studied such things as their life's work who say the earth is billions of years old and I do not, nor does the Church teach us to, take the bible literally. I cannot believe that any learned Catholic would.

    You are more than welcome to contact me and further discuss this. Perhaps I am misunderstanding your beliefs.

  • 1 decade ago

    > “On the other hand, several Catholics (and theists) who believe in evolution that I have been in contact with have been very arrogant, derogatory and disrespectful in their communications and in their forum answers.”

    It’s a shame you saw fit to make broad accusations instead of posting examples of exactly what you’re referring to. How can you expect meaningful comments back when we don’t know whether we’re all talking about the same thing? Creationists here commonly ask questions about evolution (such as "Why do we still have monkeys? or "Why are there no transitional fossils?") that ignore the most basic ideas and evidence about the subject. When they receive answers expressing a certain amount of exasperation over such willful ignorance they interpret it as disrespect, cry that they are being treated unfairly, and then turn around and ask the very same questions again. Such people do not deserve respect, at least with regard to this topic. Whether you typically fall into this category is not something I’ve looked into, but it’s something you should think about. If you’re doing stuff like this it’s not going to make Creationism look any better. And if you’re one of the few Creationists who don’t do this, you might consider having a word with those that do.

    > "Please note: The official position of the Catholic Church accepts a creationist view."

    I think you meant "evolutionist view". http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_jp02tc.htm Unlike many of its members, the Catholic Church as an institution seems to have learned something from the incident involving Galileo.

    > “This, of course, is in direct conflict with leading proponents of evolution who insist that the process can proceed by only natural means and does not require external supernatural influence.”

    No leading proponent of evolution insists the process can only proceed by natural means. They do insist it doesn’t require supernatural influence. Such a position is not in conflict with any Catholic dogma of which I’m aware. By treating these two points (“can only proceed” vs “doesn’t require”) as if they were the same you’ve mischaracterized the positions of both evolutionists and Catholics.

  • 5 years ago

    I still have not changed my mind about evolution with the meaning that "most" evolutionists speak of it. They seem to think that because science has noted a similarity between the DNA structure of animals and those of man, that it automatically means that God does not exist. What they do not take into consideration are the scientific and spiritual differences between animals and man. Very few people take the Bible literally as far as dates and time are concerned. I am a realist. I was not there when the earth was formed (nor were you or any scientist) so neither of us can say exactly how it came about. It is hypothesis on both sides based on our personal interpretation of what we see or believe we see. But I do live in the presence of God (and no I can not prove that to you either) and I do experience on a daily basis that presence and interaction so that is something I can honestly say I KNOW rather than I THINK. Just because something is not able to be proved does not make it any the less true.

  • 1 decade ago

    Once again the small groups of Atheists and Creationists are trying to make us believe that we have to choose between God and humanity's ongoing discovery of God's Creation through Science. This is not true.

    Truth cannot contradict Truth. -- Pope Leo XIII

    Most Jews and Christians do not take the stories of creation in the Bible literally. We believe the stories included in first 11 chapters of Genesis tell religious truth but not necessarily historical fact.

    One of the religious truths is that God created everything and declared all was good.

    Catholics can believe in the theories of the big bang or evolution or both or neither.

    On August 12, 1950 Pope Pius XII said in his encyclical Humani generis:

    The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God.

    Here is the complete encyclical: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encycli...

    And here is the Address of Pope John Paul II to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on October 22, 1996 speaking of the Theory of Evolution: http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_jp02tc.htm

    Here is an interesting article about Pope John Paul II's opinion in the matter: http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm...

    The Church supports Science in the discovery of God's creation. At this time, the big bang and evolution are the most logical scientific explanations.

    As long as we believe that God started the whole thing, both the Bible and responsible modern science can live in harmony.

    Here is a nice list of Christian thinkers in science: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thi...

    The Clergy Letter Project an open letter endorsing the Theory of Evolution signed by over 10,000 clergy from many different Christian denominations: http://www.butler.edu/clergyproject/rel_evol_sun.h...

    With love in Christ.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I think you are generalizing Catholics.

    I am not a Creationist persay but I am anti-evolution. The case for Creation is much easier to comprehend than is evolution.

    Science tells us that the human ability of complex reasoning and it is the cause of our advancement. Science also tells us that organisms lack the ability to reason or are limited to reason for survival.

    i.e. a Chimp will poke a stick in a termite mound to get the termites to crawl on it so he can eat it but can not plant a seed and cultivate.

    That being said, the whole premise of evolution is out of necessity. i.e. a fish lacks food and starts exploring on land or the body of water evaporates, etc. Or a lizard trying to escape a predator jumps from the trees.

    Now, according to Evolution, these acts being performed over and over with the animal supposedly reasoning that it needs to change alters it's DNA. In the case of the Lizard it realized flying (without complex reasoning) was needed to escape and became a bird, the fish (again without complex reasoning) figured it needed to hunt on land and changed it's fins into legs and became a lizard.

    The problem I have is humans have complex reasoning whereas, according to science, other organisms do not yet we are expected to believe animals can change their DNA at will.

    So to believe evolution we must both reject and accept different parts of science to make it work.

    Creationism is easier for me to comprehend then animals thinking they need a new body part and POOF there it is.

    Peace be with you

    <<<Devout Catholic>>>

  • 1 decade ago

    No, because I'm not concerned with that. This is not a place to discuss with atheists nor a place to discuss if I came from an ape. How is that religious or spiritual? I believe the Bible. Catholics might be gullible to believe we came from an ape because they typically don't study the Bible and apes and cave men are taught in school. We find dino bones but no cave men bones. What, the dinos ate them all up?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm not sure about the answer to your question, however, I wonder why I am not allowed to take communion in a Catholic or Lutheran church even though I'm Christian? I am Methodist and we invite everyone to take communion. It is very strange to me. Any ideas?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Actually, most Catholics are pretty rational when it comes to acknowledging the mountains of evidence in support of evolution...

  • 1 decade ago

    No controversy, just creationist ignorance. It' like saying there's controversy over where babies come from because nobody has researched storks.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I just saw the first few words in your paragraph "I am a creationist" and concluded that I wouldn't be able to take your question seriously.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.