few MTG questions, many thanks in advance, more questions to follow?

I can help with half your questions.

1.) Sorry not familiar with these 2 cards

2.) Yes they are still swinging at the puff of smoke where Gideon used to be. Also, yes, it sucks to be you at that point.

3.) Not sure on this one.

4.) You win. He's reduced to 0 the game is over before the Blightning goes off. Being you doesn't suck so much this time.

1. Yes, it will. Summoning sickness affects a creature if you haven't controlled it continuously since the start of your turn. Since the creature returning from the Journey or O-Ring hasn't been under your control continuously since your turn started, it'll be affected by summoning sickness.

2. Yes, that's how it works. You declare all your creatures as attacking Gideon, and once you've done that, the annihilator ability goes on the stack. When it resolves, your opponent sacrifices Gideon. Your creatures are still attacking, but the thing they were attacking no longer exists, so they essentially won't do anything. No, the damage won't go through to Gideon's controller.

3. No, it won't. Annihilator triggers when the creature is declared as an attacker. Sicne the creature has already been declared as an attacker, it's past that time, and annihilator won't trigger until the next time it attacks. I'm sure you can make do with +10/+10 and trample, though.

4. The stack resolves in LIFO (last in, first out) order. Since your Bolt was the last thing put on the stack, it's the first to resolve. It deals 3 to your opponent, putting him at 0. State-based actions are checked, see him at 0, and cause him t lose the game before his Blightning even resolves. Note that it has nothing to do with the fact that Bolt is an instant and Blightning is a sorcery - if Blightning were an instant, it would still work out that way.

a million. Permanents purely exist on the battlefield. Instants and sorceries are under no circumstances permanents, so Dissipation field won't in any respect paintings on them. 2. A creature with deadly injury is destroyed. Indestructibility capacity it won't be ready to be destroyed. So no, an indestructible creature won't be ready to be destroyed with deadly injury. lowering their sturdiness to 0 via enjoying cards like draw close of Darkness will paintings, nonetheless. they might additionally be sacrificed or exiled merely high-quality. 3. enormously lots. safety from something capacity (between different issues) that it won't be ready to be blocked via that something, and all injury via that something which would be dealt to it incredibly is prevented. considering your 2 creatures have safety from one yet another, neither can block or be dealt injury via the different. 4. No. Twincast makes a replica of the spell - Redirect...properly, redirects it. With Twincast, you positioned yet another reproduction of the spell on the stack, and can pick new targets for it. So in case you solid a Lightning Bolt, then Twincast it, you wind up with 2 Lightning Bolts, bargains 3 injury to a minimum of one ingredient and 3 to a various (or 6 to a minimum of one ingredient, in case you so desire). Redirect juts differences the objective, so as a replace of the Bolt dealing 3 to a minimum of one ingredient, it bargains that 3 to a minimum of something else fullyyt.