Nature vs Humans???}|?

Question

the laws of nature, in my opinion, only affects things on earth. All of it has to do with scarcity of resources. All animal live and die because resources are limited and f we dont die new ones cant be made which evolution will make i stronger and more fit to the environment. If you are much more fit, ou get more resources. And the cycle repeats. But if huamns can get toa place with unlimite dresources, then everything will change. like being able to stop aging.Imagine if you didnt have to worry about dying from age? if we colonize space, we will become much more than animals. We will become humans as human, a whole new thing. Were already braking some rules of nature. Like equality. nature dsoesnt alow it. for example, there is a reason why there are strong and weak animals. Because the strong gets more girls and food over the weak. If we distribute stuff equally, the strong wont live longer and the weak will live longer. But equality is such a important thing in society. Without it, everything goes chaos.So once we break the laws of nature, we become something great.

Update:

in a rush. im sure kids, like me, these days dont give about correct spelling. look i forgot a apostrophe

DNAunion · Accepted Answer

And, um, where's the question?

Anonymous · Answer

Human vs Human - Human scuffling with yet another human to proceed to exist or triumph over Human vs Society - Can advise 2 issues a global a human beings lives in or the folk round Human vs Nature - is Human Vs. the organic aspects earth wind fireplace water

Jitendra · Answer

Many people have believed that musical ability itself is an inborn talent.  Some scientists currently believe absolute pitch may have an underlying genetic  basis and are trying to locate genetic correlates;  while evidence suggesting a genetic locus has recently arisen,  most believe that the acquisition of absolute pitch requires early training during a critical period of development, regardless of whether a genetic predisposition toward development exists.  The "unlearning theory", first proposed by Otto Abraham,  has recently been revived by developmental psychologists who argue that every person possesses absolute pitch (as a mode of perceptual processing) as an infant, but that a shift in cognitive processing styles (from local, absolute processing to global, relational processing) causes most people to unlearn it; or, at least, causes children with musical training to discard absolute pitch as they learn to identify musical intervals.  Additionally, any nascent absolute pitch may be lost simply by the lack of reinforcement or lack of clear advantages in most activities in which the developing child is involved. An unequivocal resolution to the ongoing debate would require controlled experiments  that are both impractical and unethical.

Researchers have been trying to teach absolute pitch ability for more than a century, and various commercial absolute-pitch training courses have been offered to the public since the early 1900s. No adult has ever been documented to have acquired the ability, as all adults who have undergone AP training have failed, when formally tested, to show "an unqualified level of accuracy... comparable to that of AP possessors".

For children aged 2–4, observations have suggested a certain method of music education may be successful in training absolute pitch, but the same method has also been shown to fail with students 5 years and older.

thirdpartycandidateneeded · Answer

Greatness starts with proofreading. English isn't your first language is it?

Trending News

Nature vs Humans???}|?

4 Answers