Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How will you prove that three vectors are mutually perpendicular?
Given that the modulus of the scalar triple product of the three vectors a, b and c is abc.
( |[a b c]| = abc )
How will you prove that they are mutually perpendicular?
( a.b = b.c = c.a = 0)
The converse is already known,
i.e, whenever three vectors a, b and c are known to be mutually perpendicular, then their scalar triple product is abc...
help?
2 Answers
- SCARLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
The scalar triple product for vectors a, b, c is
a • (b x c)
First, let
e = b x c (Eq 0)
then, recall from the definition of the cross product
|e| = |b x c| = |b||c| sinβ (Eq 1)
where: β = angle between b & c
Next, recall from the definition of the dot product
a • e = |a||e| cosα (Eq 2)
where: α = angle between a & e
Equating Eq0, Eq1 & Eq2
a • (b x c) = |a||b||c|cosα sinβ (Eq3)
Our goal is to show
a • (b x c) = |a||b||c|
and from Eq3, it's obvious that the only way this is possible is if
cosα sinβ = 1
and THIS is only possible if
cosα =1
sinβ =1
which implies
α = 0
β = π/2
So, the angle between b & c = π/2, thus they are perpendicular. By definition, e = (b x c) is perpendicular to both b & c. And the angle between a & e is 0, so a is perpendicular to b & c. Thus, a, b, c are mutually perpendicular when a•(bxc) = |a||b||c|.
- 4 years ago
Are you confident you typed the question wisely? If OB and OC are seen to be vectors then OC won't equivalent a million/3 OB. For one vector to be a relentless diverse of yet another they might desire to be parallel yet they have been defined to be perpendicular. If OB and OC are line segments from the beginning to the factors B and C respectively, then there is not any longer something proscribing the size of those line segments. the only advice given is they are perpendicular. you're able to make the line segments as long (or short) as you like and that they're going to nevertheless be perpendicular. So it should not be provable. OA isn't even used for something. Why is it there?