Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Successful windpipe transplant in Italy using stem cells. Opinions on 8 year delay in America?

Just read where, in Rome, doctors have successfully transplanted 2 windpipes using stem cell technology (a type of transplant which heretofore was medically impossible)

We in the U.S. instead, were treated to 8 years under the George W. Bush administration to his religious philosophy as to why stem cells should not be used.

I wonder if his religious idealism would have been so shortsighted if a member of his family had been suffering a type of cancer that might have benefitted from an allocation of government funds for stem cell research.

Where does a president of the people (some of whom have no such religious beliefs) come off dictating how funds (which in the final analysis belong to ALL citizens) should be allocated?

How was this ever passed by Congress or the Senate or whatever office should have had a say as to how these funds were to be allocated?

How do personal religious beliefs of a president get to hinder medical research in a Democracy?

Are we (were we) living in the Middle Ages?

Update:

Attn: The_Cricket Thinking Pink

So, in your mind, all is OK.

As did Bush, and millions like him, you would stand on principle and nit-pick while people died.

I hope you never have to experience the pain of a family member being consumed by cancer.

You would be surprised how quickly your philosophy would change.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    The patient's windpipe was transplanted using her own stem cells.

    The debate was not on whether to use stem cells or not. The debate was whether to use adult stem cells or embryonic stem cells. Adult stem cells have more, and more positive, results than embryonic stem cells. There are currently no restriction in the US against using adult stem cells.

    And like it or not, the president is never going to represent all peoples' beliefs. It's impossible to please everyone.

    Further, there are people who find using embryonic stem cells morally objectionable for non-religious reasons, so it doesn't have to be a religious thing.

    Edit: Try looking at my profile. It says very clearly that I lost my mom a year ago to breast cancer. Further, my dad died of congestive heart failure. My grandma died from cancer. I had an aunt die from a stroke. I had a cousin die of kidney failure. And that's just the tip of the iceberg with my family.

    I am 29 years old. My parents are dead. My grandparents are all dead and have been for years. Half of my aunts and uncles are dead. Several of my cousins are dead. Family friends I knew my whole life are dead. Close friends are dead. For every year I've been alive, at least one person I knew and loved has died.

    So I'm the wrong person to talk to as though I've never lost anyone. I've lost more in the first 29 years of my life than most people will lose in a lifetime.

    And I still think using embryonic stem cells is sick and wrong. Adult stem cells have had more successful results than embryonic stem cells.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Was it embryonic or adult stem cells?

    There have been much greater successes with adult stem cell technology (and there are no ethical concerns) than with embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells, in addition to taking a human life, are usually rejected by the patient.

    Ahh yes, no surprise here:

    "Two types of cell were taken from Ms Castillo: cells lining her windpipe, and adult stem cells - very immature cells from the bone marrow - which could be encouraged to grow into the cells that normally surround the windpipe."

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7735696.stm

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) basically on the grounds that 1998, while a set led by ability of Dr. James Thompson on the college of Wisconsin progressed a technique to isolate and strengthen the cells. grownup stem cells, which includes blood-forming stem cells in bone marrow (noted as hematopoietic stem cells, or HSCs), are presently the sole kind of stem cellular popular to handle human illnesses. docs have been moving HSCs in bone marrow transplants for over 40 years. extra progressed techniques of amassing, or "harvesting," HSCs at the instant are used with the intention to handle leukemia, lymphoma and a number of of alternative inherited blood problems. The medical potential of grownup stem cells has additionally been examined in the treatment of alternative human illnesses that comprise diabetes and progressed kidney maximum cancers. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, those extra moderen makes use of have in contact learn with an quite limited style of sufferers.

  • 1 decade ago

    Ronnie Raygun and his wife were opposed to stem cell research until Ronnie was diagnosed with Alzheimer's.

    After that Nancy was in favour of stem cell research.

    If anybody questions whether Reagan would have opposed stem cell research they should read his 1988 proclamation on abortion.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • I'd suggest posting this in the Politics section.

    However, I believe it is unfortunate.

  • Cindi
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    isnt funny how we use stem cells..... and some people still don't believe in creation.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.