Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is Social Security a pyramid scheme?

Could the Government be administering a pyramid scheme even though it is outlawed?

Well, we all know the government says one thing and does another.

DON'T STEAL, THE GOVERNMENT HATES COMPETITION!!!

Of course, it is the ultimate pyramid scheme.

Politicians convinced the public that is necessary to take from the younger generation and give to the older generation in the pursuit to buy the political support of the older generation while simultaneously, promising the younger generation the same benefits years later.

However, any idiot can see that is unsustainable as it is quite evident today.

Over the next 40 years, the government has promised baby boomers the delight of Social Security where it totals up to 56 trillion dollars, and guess how much the government has reserved.

ZERO!!!

Update:

Pretty sure I know how it is funded

Take money from younger people and give to old people.

Update 2:

A pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves the exchange of money primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, without any product or service being delivered.

Sound familiar?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    It is . Madoff would be a amateur on the pure scale of operation .

    There is no cash saved it only owed back . JFK started stealing from it to make budget

    look good

  • Kini
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    The product being delivered as you put it, is social security benefits for disabled and elderly. They have to come from current payroll deductions.

    In a Ponzi or pyramid scheme, the creator is the one who profits personally from taking money from one investor and using it to pay phony dividends to another invester and keep shuffling the investors' money around. The U.S. government does take employee/employer contributions from people who are working and use them to pay people who are reaching retirement age and others who use Social Security such as indigent low income people who are disabled, survivor benefits for spouses and children and other programs.

    So because the government does not keep the money, and pays all of it out in benefits, it is not a Ponzi scheme. Social Security is not bankrupt. It has $250 billion in reserves invested in government bonds. The surplus was used up by years of Congressional grabs and leaving IOUs and also more programs causing a drain on the fund.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Social security is paid for out of the general fund, so no its not a pyramid scheme. In addition, costs would not be so high if there were not so many bad backers,mildly depressed, etc.. on social security. Social security after-all, was originally setup the deaf and blind, and was latter extended to those in wheel chairs, without a limb, and stuff like that.

    edit:

    I forgot to state that it was originally setup for seniors too. Seniors, however, do not create most of the costs we have with social security those bad backers, mildly depressed, etc.. do.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Social Security is "pay as you go." Each year is funded by money collected that same year. That's not really a pyramid scheme.

    Now, if you project how many people will collect social security and how many people will pay into it a few years down the road, there's a pretty big, obvious problem coming. But you fundamentally misunderstand how social security is funded.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Jack P
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Its more like a trapezoid. Some people pay into it but die before they turn 65, but the majority of people live past 65.

  • 1 decade ago

    If I say "Yes", and I do, it does not alter any fact: We still have to fix it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    yes it is

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.