Liberals; which part of the Constitution do YOU disagree with?

From what I've seen, most of them are againt the Second and Tenth Amendments, and have a warped sense of the First.

Your logic is as skewed as TEA P.

Why are "non-liberals" answering a question meant for "liberals"?

Exactly . . . it easier to support a point of view when you put words in your opponents' mouths.

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with disagreeing with parts of the Constitution OR with hating the TEA P, or is that the part of The Constitution that you disagree with?

C'mon, please come up with a question that is actually intellectually challenging and/or stimulating.

I observe which you have faith what the liberals declare approximately the two communities instead of what the two group's movements demonstrate. Liberals write charges to forbid faith to be seen exterior of your place or church. Liberals write charges to regulate broadcast IDEOLOGICAL content cloth you're totally unable to quote ANY way conservatives ever balked religious or expressive freedom or tried to make a theocracy the place liberals have administration, loose speech is overtly FORBIDDEN different than in detailed "loose speech zones." Conservatives purely element-OUT that antiamerican issues are antiamerican and liberals respond with the aid of exclaiming it would be FORBIDDEN to accomplish that. Liberals are smitten with the aid of ensuring you are able to't defend your infants in case you're actually not in a coma and are an grownup, all of it quite is obtrusive to you.

Yeah, because the Tea Party loves the Constitution so much that they want to take out parts of Article I, Article II, and Article III as well as parts of the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments.

Tea Party does not equal Constitution.

But personally I hate the 10th Amendment. Gives states too much power to shut down things that need to be done.

The Tea Party is all about a right wing ideological agenda - disagreeing with them means disagreeing with that agenda - not with the constitution.

Liberals, just like conservatives, believe in the constitution. We, however, think it is a foundation and framework for a well run society. It is not set in stone and applies to all societies from 1789 onward.

Societies change with time and we must adapt these changes around the constitution.

I don't think we have a constitutional right to have firearms. At the time of it's writing, the country needed a militia and people had to defend themselves against wild animals. Today, we have a nuclear armed army and don't need to protect ourselves from animals.

so not supporting Tea Party is now equal to hating the Constitution? aren't we full of ourselves today?

I agree with Legio XVII -- I like the Constitution just fine the way it is.

The Tea Party in no way represents the Constitution and what it stands for. They are just angry idiots. Funded by billionaires.

I don't like that Congress got to make up its own rules.

Another person who's been brainwashed into attacking liberals when in fact Bush was the 1st to order bailouts to failing companies and major Socialistic activities.