Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How to write a debate about compulsory voting?

I have to finish this before Monday, but I can't think of anything else. When it gets to my turn, I need to say it for 3 minutes. So far I can only last for 1 minute and 40 seconds.

Here is what I have to say: (the intro is a must)

Good morning, Mr. Speaker, fellow students and debaters. Today I'll be representing a strong argument for "Should voting be compulsory?"

My Argument the freedom of choice.

Yes, voting should be compulsory because then we will be able to choose the person that best represents our country. Judging by the Australian population, those who don't vote can make a big difference. Otherwise, if our representative is not good enough, the economy of the country will go down and leave a bad impression on others and its people. Compulsory voting creates a healthier democracy and a better society. It encourages individuals to take an interest in political affairs and to contribute in public debate. It promotes good citizenship and it guarantees an accountable and representative government. Compulsory voting also allows politicians to focus on defending their platforms rather than encourage you to show up in the first place.

Conclusion: (I'm the last person of my team, so I have to end this with a conclusion)

As the results of our debate, it all says voting should be compulsory becuase we are in a democratic society. Everyone has he right to vote. It is their responsibility to vote and to choose their own leaders. So voting has to be compulsory.

All of the above last for only 1 min and 40 sec. I need it to be 3 min long. Is there anything I need to edit, add or revise?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago

    My suggestions are:

    1. Add facts and figures to back up your 1st argument about: " Judging by the Australian population, those who don't vote can make a big difference." You will probably have to go back a year or two to get them, but it makes your argument much stronger than mere conjecture.

    2. As the other members of your panel are speaking...listen carefully for strong arguments. These are the arguments you will want to reiterate in your closing remarks. It would help you a great deal to take some notes as they speak instead of just worrying about what you are planning to say. I assure you, if you do this, you will have AT LEAST 3 or more minutes of speech, total. In fact, you are liable to exceed the time limit, so try to keep your statements clear and concise.

  • Erika
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    balloting ought to be limited to indigenous electorate and Nationalised electorate that have lived right here legally and worked and paid into the countries materials for 15 years. never ought to every person settle for the vote who can not communicate English. balloting ought to be made vital yet a no self belief vote must additionally be comprise. ATB pink

  • 1 decade ago

    Why don't you explain what happened in Australia? What about what happens in your own country (i.e. the current amount of people who do vote)?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.