Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Popular Mechanics recently published an article on the possible outcomes of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan...?
and found that a combination of small diesel-electric submarines, advanced ballistic missile technology (including the deadly ASBM), and an overall military strategy that is basically tailored to prevent us from intervening would result in the loss of an American Nimitz-class aircraft carrier and the occupation of Taiwan. Doesn't anyone else think that it's rather naive to be calling for cuts in military spending during such a crucial technology race?
(This study was done by RAND, a non-partisan think tank)
Government: Seriously? I doubt that the 32 Nobel laureates affiliated with RAND have all been mindless neocons. Why don't you present an example of how, exactly, the study in question is biased instead of making inane accusations.
3 Answers
- ExcoLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
1 - The US never had any business in the Far-East in the first place.
2 - In a real war no matter how much the US spends China will out-power America.
3 - I mean, come on, they can pull the plug on inflation and watch the US sink all by itself.
4 - There are popular beliefs between residents of Taiwan to go back to China.
5 - The US is in too close a tie with China for both of them to initiate a war.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I'm starting to think that Washington and China are kinda on the same team now!
CRASH JP MORGAN BUY SILVER
- 1 decade ago
well, RAND is a neocon think tank, but they might be telling the truth.
