Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Christians: Could you please explain how 1 Corinthians 7 and 2 Corinthians 6 are non-contradictory?
1 Corinthians 7:14 -
"For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy."
2 Corinthians 6:14 -
"14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"
One appears to say that, if an unbeliever and believer marry, the unbeliever will be sanctified.
The other appears to say that the unbeliever would still be "unrighteous" (wicked in some versions).
Can you remedy this apparent contradiction for me?
@ Fireball - Yet again, you have failed to answer the question.
"Warning - if you disobey this verse, AMAZING THINGS could happen!"
That is what you just said.
@ ihaveproof - what? Children-husbands are sanctified by believing children-wives? Please explain...this can't be answered with a single dismissive sentence like that.
@ Citolduso $ Alan - you've interpreted the verse to add words that are not there.
The (7:14) verse plainly states that if a believing woman marries a non-believing husband, the husband would be sanctified (brought closer to God). The 6:14 verse plainly states that the husband WOULD NOT be sanctified, he would remain unrighteous/wicked.
THAT is the contradiction, not some pre-marriage post-marriage issue.
@ ihaveproof - "the unbelieving husband is sanctified " - "and the unbelieving wife is sanctified"
Nothing about children being sanctified.
@ ihaveproof - you seem to be arguing over the 'degree of sanctification'...not helping. ANY amount of sanctification is in opposition with 2 Cor. 6.
EVERYONE!!!
To clarify:
The contradiction is not whether the couple is married or not married or not YET married or thinking about getting married or friends or best friends or having kids or not having kids...
The contradiction is whether a non-believing person is brought closer to God (sanctified) by partnering with a believer.
2 Corinthians 6 says no: "what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness?" Hanging out with non-believers doesn't help them one bit...it's simply associating with wickedness.
This is not what 1 Corinthians 7 says.
@ ihaveproof - so the thousands of ministers that preach that verse in relationship to marriage are wrong to do so? All other references to the word 'yoked' in reference to marriage are completely irrelevant?
"What god has yoked together" being one?
@ ihaveproof - "And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord" 1 Corinthians 7:10.
NOT a suggestion.
12 Answers
- ElihuLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
1 Corinthians 7:14 (in context) is instruction concerning Marriage.
2 Corinthians 6:14 (in context) is instruction concerning separating ones self from evil relationships.
The first verse speaks only of Marriage, and the unbelieving partner is sanctified through the believer, therefore, the unbeliever, is not considered, for all intensive purposes, evil.
The second verse is a plain outright instruction; not to be bound together with unbelievers, and adds No qualifying exceptions.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
You' kinda need to look at the "BIG picture" What Paul is saying is simple, if a man and women are married, and One becomes a Christian, don't run off and leave your unbelieving spouse, by living a Christian life, one might just be able to life a life that the unbeliever would admire and see as good and there by, the unbeliever would come to know Christ their self.
In the second verse, Paul is saying, don't intentionally go out and find a heathen as your spouse. Its just not a good ideal, the unbeliever will make life more difficult for you if you do so. Not so much intentionally but just by the simple act of the way they would live their life.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I am almost certain that 1st Corinthians was referring to the child, not the spouse.
The believing member sanctifies the child, not the spouse. The un-believing spouse is sanctified to be married, not to enter heaven. (Paul clarifies earlier that this is merely his suggestion.)
I have not formally studied 2nd Corinthians (I am more interested in the old covenant/testament), though I found nothing that even implies that Paul was referring to marriage in this verse.
In the first letter, Ravi Paul was referring to marriage for the purposes of fulfilling sexual desires. In his second letter, he was referring to fellowship and communion. When fellowship and communion are used together in Greek, it usually refers to the relationship that we call "bro/bro-ness/ brotherhood" in America.
"The contradiction is whether a non-believing person is brought closer to God (sanctified) by partnering with a believer."
Sanctified as you are using it would be a mis-translation. They are sanctified for marriage, not sanctified for heaven, forgiveness, communion, etc.
A more general note: Corinthians is more of a casual letter between brothers in Christ. Ravi Paul definitely declares divine inspiration/authorship in certain parts, though in 1 Corinthians 7:14, he specifically clarifies that it is simply advise- not the new covenant. Assuming that this is a contradiction (which it is probably not)- if it were found in the book of Isaiah, the Bible's divine authorship would be in question. In letters as casual as Corinthians, it brings forth no questions regarding the bibles divine authorship.
7:12
To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her.
In English, as all other languages, sentences are read in the same direction that letters are read (in English, left to right). Thus, 7:10 comes before 7:12. You probably already knew that, though your mistake shows that you are probably not reading every verse on the same page.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- DuckyLv 71 decade ago
The first one is talking about two christians spouses. If a christian spouse is willing to stop his sinful behavior than a wife should let him. It is better to remarry your christian spouse who has repented and changed his ways..... many christian husbands didn't know what it meant to be a good Christian husband until Jesus came and cleared it up. This is why Paul told women to give your husbands a second chance if they prove that they are now following Christs teachings.
This one is talking about non-christian spouses. The bible says that if you are already married it is good to stay married for the children's sake. How-ever if the unchristian spouse leaves you(without you agreeing) than you are freed from the law that says "Do not divorce." It was your spouses wrong, not yours.
You have to look in the historical context to understand what Paul was saying. In the first lines Paul mentioned "Lord" which indicates he is talking about something Jesus said in the gospels. Therefore we look back on what Jesus said in the Gospel and unerstand what kind of marriage situation Paul is talking about now. Than he switches topics and talks about a different marriage situation that has not yet been adressed.
- CitoldusoLv 71 decade ago
It is not a commandment. If you were already married to an unbeliever then 7:14, if you are not already married at all then try to avoid 6:14 The point is not to put yourself in a situation that could bring you down or cause you to compromise your faith.
Source(s): And you sir are trying make contradictions that are not there. - Anonymous1 decade ago
In the first verse they are already married, nothing to do there, in the second, they are not yet married and are given advice before they marry.
Here's a contradiction- Can a happy person want to make someone else unhappy?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Fireball is right.The second verse here does warn you that it's a bad idea to do it.You know the old man doesn't want to go with the wife and kids to church, so it causes tension.But the first you says if you do hook up with someone that doesn't believe like you do then don't get separated but hang in there and if your living like your supposed to, that eventually they'll start believing like you do.
- Saddy DumpingtonLv 71 decade ago
Perhaps two non-Christians got married, then one of them was converted to Christianity. Before he/she was saved, he/she was not trying to live a life according to God's standards. They did not know any better. But after one of them was saved, they were still married to their non-believeing spouse. I hope this explains the first passage of scripture. I think the second passage refers to a person who is already a Christian marrying a non-Christian. Since they are a Christian, they know better than to marry a nonbeliever.
- 1 decade ago
One refers to those who were married before they became believers; the other to those who are believers considering marrying non-believers.
No contradiction in that.
If married...do not divorce because you have become a Christian
If not yet married...do not be 'unequally yoked'