Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in SportsCricket · 1 decade ago

I.Sharma & S.Sreesanth took two consecutive wickets ....?

off the last two balls of the last match they played.

I.Sharma in the third test Vs NZ, and

S.Sreesanth in the first ODI Vs NZ.

What is your say about their bowling and

Will they take a third wicket with the first ball they bowl next.It is not a hat--trick but still a rare feat equal to a hat-trick.

Update:

To me it is a good sign,since India has been struggling to polish the tail after removing the top order often.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I.Sharma is a talented guy.... but S.Sreesanth who is equally talented cud not establish because of his emotions

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Good Bowling by India and have shown their bowling strenght too under India C Team.

    Although NZ gave a good fightback even after being Vettori,Ryder and many Important players left out for rest.

    Selection of India was pretty poor again but still good game by them.

    Prediction - India 3-1 (if a game is washed out or cancelled for some reason,3-2 or 4-1.)

    Challenge is on for 2 wickets at end and the question you are on about.

    Only possible if India bats first and let Kiwis Chase.

  • 5 years ago

    I received't dig a lot deeper in the stats. Murali bowled predominantly in subcontinent pitches, which supposedly made his undemanding better efficient as assumed by using some shoppers. i encourage to determination. Murali had to bowl to extremely extremely some actual order batsmen who're better efficient batsmen. they could devour better bowls and consequently it could be better tricky to get them out. this may easily worsen the standard of Murali. also, subcontinent tracks are back predominantly batting tracks, so even if the bowl is spinning sq., it takes better runs in accordance to wicket. Murali also had Chaminda Vaas to percentage wickets. Agreed, he wasn't just about as solid as Mcgrath yet he became very solid. In favour of Warne, the leg spin is a better tricky paintings and also a lot less fruitful in certain circumstances. Leg spinners are straightforward to hammer all around the field. All it takes is a fragment short shipping. I have stated before and may want to learn this back. statistics do no longer reveal the finished image. both were in a league of their own. Warne became a pride to visual reveal unit with the way he became the bowl. If i became dealing with him as a batsman i'd leave the bat and watch the ball with jaw-dropping awe. yet inspite of this, if I were to fee Murali and Warne, i'd supply Murali a 10 and Warne a 9.8(no longer out of 10, only for the sake of evaluation to reveal how close they are.)

  • 1 decade ago

    As long as they take wickets at the right time, that's enough.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Any one of it could be possible but not both....

    Source(s): mind calculation
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.